MedPath

Comparison of 2 Laryngoscopes for Endotracheal Intubation in Children Younger Than 2 Years Old

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Endotracheal Intubation
Interventions
Device: Endotracheal intubation
Registration Number
NCT01488370
Lead Sponsor
Loma Linda University
Brief Summary

This is a prospective randomized clinical study to be performed in pediatric patients under the age of 2 years who are undergoing surgical procedures requiring endotracheal intubation. Time to endotracheal intubation will be compared between patients intubated using a GlideScope® video laryngoscope, those intubated with a Storz DCI® video laryngoscope, and those intubated by standard direct laryngoscopy. The study hypothesis is that the time to endotracheal intubation will be decreased in the Storz DCI® video laryngoscope group when compared to the GlideScope® video laryngoscope group and standard laryngoscopy.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
65
Inclusion Criteria
  • Pediatric patients under the age of 2 years undergoing surgeries requiring endotracheal intubation at LLUMC will be eligible for participation in this study
Exclusion Criteria
  • Children with increased pulmonary aspiration risk;
  • Prior documentation of difficult endotracheal intubation;
  • Those that lack legal representative consent

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Standard LaryngoscopeEndotracheal intubationA device for endotracheal intubation
GlidescopeEndotracheal intubationA device for endotracheal intubation.
StorzEndotracheal intubationA device for endotracheal intubation.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Measurement of Time to Intubation Will Begin at the Time of Mouth Opening and End With the Removal of the Tip of the Laryngoscope Blade From the Patient's Mouth After Successful Endotracheal Intubation.Less than one day, representing the day of surgery and period of endotracheal intubation during induction of general anesthesia
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Successful Intubation After Three Laryngoscopy AttemptsLess than one day, representing the day of surgery and period of endotracheal intubation during induction of general anesthesia.
Successful Intubation After Two Laryngoscopy AttemptsLess than one day, representing the day of surgery and period of endotracheal intubation during induction of general anesthesia.
Successful Intubation After One Laryngoscopy AttemptLess than one day, representing the day of surgery and period of endotracheal intubation during induction of general anesthesia.

Other secondary outcome measures will be the use of external laryngeal manipulation to improve glottic view, tissue trauma and type,and method of rescue if initial intubation attempt proves unsuccessful.

Successful Intubation After Four Laryngoscopy AttemptsThrough endotracheal intubation during induction of general anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Loma Linda University Department of Anesthesiology

🇺🇸

Loma Linda, California, United States

Loma Linda University Medical Center

🇺🇸

Loma Linda, California, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath