Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01488370
NCT01488370CompletedNot Applicable

A Comparison of the Glidescope® Video Laryngoscope and the Storz DCI® Video Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation in Children Younger Than Two Years of Age

Loma Linda University2 sites in 1 country65 target enrollmentStarted: November 1, 2011Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
65
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Measurement of Time to Intubation Will Begin at the Time of Mouth Opening and End With the Removal of the Tip of the Laryngoscope Blade From the Patient's Mouth After Successful Endotracheal Intubation.

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This is a prospective randomized clinical study to be performed in pediatric patients under the age of 2 years who are undergoing surgical procedures requiring endotracheal intubation. Time to endotracheal intubation will be compared between patients intubated using a GlideScope® video laryngoscope, those intubated with a Storz DCI® video laryngoscope, and those intubated by standard direct laryngoscopy. The study hypothesis is that the time to endotracheal intubation will be decreased in the Storz DCI® video laryngoscope group when compared to the GlideScope® video laryngoscope group and standard laryngoscopy.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
— to 23 Months (Child)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Pediatric patients under the age of 2 years undergoing surgeries requiring endotracheal intubation at LLUMC will be eligible for participation in this study

Exclusion Criteria

  • Children with increased pulmonary aspiration risk;
  • Prior documentation of difficult endotracheal intubation;
  • Those that lack legal representative consent

Arms & Interventions

Glidescope

Active Comparator

A device for endotracheal intubation.

Intervention: Endotracheal intubation (Device)

Storz

Active Comparator

A device for endotracheal intubation.

Intervention: Endotracheal intubation (Device)

Standard Laryngoscope

Active Comparator

A device for endotracheal intubation

Intervention: Endotracheal intubation (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Measurement of Time to Intubation Will Begin at the Time of Mouth Opening and End With the Removal of the Tip of the Laryngoscope Blade From the Patient's Mouth After Successful Endotracheal Intubation.

Time Frame: Less than one day, representing the day of surgery and period of endotracheal intubation during induction of general anesthesia

Secondary Outcomes

  • Successful Intubation After Three Laryngoscopy Attempts(Less than one day, representing the day of surgery and period of endotracheal intubation during induction of general anesthesia.)
  • Successful Intubation After One Laryngoscopy Attempt(Less than one day, representing the day of surgery and period of endotracheal intubation during induction of general anesthesia.)
  • Successful Intubation After Two Laryngoscopy Attempts(Less than one day, representing the day of surgery and period of endotracheal intubation during induction of general anesthesia.)
  • Successful Intubation After Four Laryngoscopy Attempts(Through endotracheal intubation during induction of general anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Elizabeth Ghazal

MD

Loma Linda University

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials