Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02607475
NCT02607475UnknownNot Applicable

Evaluation of Robotic Telesonography for Obstetric and Adult and Pediatric Abdominal Imaging

University of Saskatchewan3 sites in 1 country90 target enrollmentStarted: November 1, 2015Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
90
Locations
3
Primary Endpoint
Diagnostic performance of robotic telesonography, expressed as the concordance of measurements and concordance of findings visualized with robotic telesonography using conventional sonography as a reference standard.

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Robotic telesonography, in which an expert remotely performs sonography in real time, has recently emerged as an opportunity to perform sonography at remote centres. Using a robotic system and an assistant with limited training at the remote site, an expert can manipulate an ultrasound probe and generate images in real-time via an Internet connection. This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of robotic telesonography for obstetric and adult and pediatric abdominal imaging in a centre with established sonography services which will be used as a comparator to robotic telesonography.

Detailed Description

Lack of trained sonographers in remote communities limits access to sonography for many patients. As a result, patients must travel or be transported to secondary and tertiary care centres, which often delays diagnosis and subsequent treatment, creates burdens for patients and their families, and increases healthcare costs. Robotic telesonography, in which an expert remotely performs sonography in real time, has recently emerged as an opportunity to provide sonography regardless of the availability of a skilled operator at the site. Studies primarily originating in Europe have demonstrated robotic telesonography in abdominal, pelvic, obstetric, and cardiologic applications in adults. However, the full potential of robotic telesonography across many imaging applications has yet to be explored, and robotic telesonography has not yet been trialed in Canada. This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of robotic telesonography in a centre with established sonography services which will be used as a comparator to robotic telesonography. Approximately 30 patients will be recruited for each substudy (obstetric, adult abdominal, and pediatric abdominal). All patients will receive both conventional and robotic scans in a crossover design. The sonographer performing the scan will be asked to complete a data collection form which will collect information about duration of the exam and any challenges encountered. Following the completion of both scans, the patient-site assistant will provide a questionnaire to the patient (or for children, a parent/guardian of the patient) regarding his/her experience with the system. A physician will review images generated using either the robotic telesonography or conventional sonography systems and report findings on a standardized reporting form.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Na
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
5 Years to — (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients scheduled to have an abdominal study or second trimester ultrasound study at Royal University Hospital or Saskatoon Medical Imaging.
  • •Pediatric abdominal substudy: male and female patients 5 years of age or older and less than 18 years of age
  • •Adult abdominal substudy: male and female patients 18 years of age and older
  • •Obstetrics substudy: second trimester patients 18 years of age and older

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patients who do not meet the inclusion criteria above
  • •Patients who are in distress prior to or during the exam

Arms & Interventions

Robotic telesonography compared to conventional sonography

Experimental

All participants will receive two imaging studies: (1) Robotic telesonography using the MELODY Patient System (AdEchoTech) in conjunction with the SonixTablet ultrasound system (BK Ultrasound, formerly Ultrasonix), and (2) conventional sonography using EPIQ 5 (Philips) or LOGIQ E9 (GE Healthcare).

Intervention: Robotic telesonography (MELODY Patient System, AdEchoTech) (Device)

Robotic telesonography compared to conventional sonography

Experimental

All participants will receive two imaging studies: (1) Robotic telesonography using the MELODY Patient System (AdEchoTech) in conjunction with the SonixTablet ultrasound system (BK Ultrasound, formerly Ultrasonix), and (2) conventional sonography using EPIQ 5 (Philips) or LOGIQ E9 (GE Healthcare).

Intervention: Conventional sonography (EPIQ 5, Philips or LOGIQ E9, GE Healthcare) (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Diagnostic performance of robotic telesonography, expressed as the concordance of measurements and concordance of findings visualized with robotic telesonography using conventional sonography as a reference standard.

Time Frame: Research images will be interpreted within 8 weeks

Secondary Outcomes

  • Acceptability of the robotic telesonography system to remote users (sonographers) and patient-site assistants measured using Likert items(1 day)
  • Duration of robotic telesonography exams relative to conventional sonography(1 day)
  • Acceptability of the robotic telesonography experience to patients measured using Likert items(1 day)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Paul Babyn

Professor

University of Saskatchewan

Study Sites (3)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials