跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03591328
NCT03591328Unknown不适用

Exploring the Mechanism of Plaque Rupture in Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Coronary CT Angiography and Computational Fluid Dynamics II (EMERALD II) Study

Seoul National University Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 429 人开始时间: 2018年7月9日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
429
试验地点
1
主要终点
discrimination index of prediction model

研究概览

简要总结

The EMERALD II study is a multinational, multicenter, and retrospective study. ACS patients who underwent CCTA from 1 months to 3 years prior to the event will be retrospectively identified. Plaques in the non-culprit vessels will be regarded as a primary control group.

详细描述

The mechanisms of plaque rupture are not fully understood. Hemodynamic forces, plaque vulnerability, and the interaction between these factors may cause plaque instability and subsequent acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Previously, the first-in-human study, EMERALD I, showed that the addition of hemodynamic parameters calculated noninvasively from coronary computed tomography (CCTA) using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) improved the ability to predict the risk of ACS compared with conventional approaches based on anatomical stenosis severity and adverse plaque characteristics. In addition to hemodynamic properties, quantified compositional plaque volumes such as fibrofatty and necrotic core volume (FFNC) or low-attenuation plaque burden (% plaque to vessel volume) have been proven to be robust prognostic indicators of ACS. While various hemodynamic and plaque features predictive of ACS have been introduced, the relative importance among them and the additive value of the risk model with the best features over the current diagnostic scheme of CCTA have not been proposed. In this regard, we designed the subsequent EMERALD II study to find the best hemodynamic and plaque features in prediction of ACS from comprehensive CCTA analysis, including per-lesion and per-vessel plaque quantification and hemodynamic analysis, and to investigate whether a comprehensive risk prediction model with them has an incremental value in a larger population.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Control
时间视角
Other

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients who presented with ACS* and underwent invasive coronary angiography with identifiable culprit lesion
  • The patients who underwent coronary CT angiography, regardless of the reason (for example, routine healthcare check-up, or evaluation for stable angina or atypical chest pain) prior to the acute event.
  • Time limit of CCTA: 1 months ~ 3 years prior to the event.
  • Definition of ACS:
  • A. The patients with acute myocardial infarction should have cardiac enzyme elevation and identified culprit lesion confirmed by invasive coronary angiography, IVUS, or OCT.
  • B. The patients with unstable angina should have evidence of plaque rupture, which includes at least one of the following: (1) the presence of plaque rupture or haziness including thrombus at invasive coronary angiography, (2) angiographic stenosis ≥90%, or (3) the evidence of rupture confirmed by IVUS or OCT.
  • Exclusion criteria for Patient enrollment
  • Patients with ACS without clear evidence of culprit lesion
  • Patients with stents in two or more vessel territories prior to CCTA
  • Poor quality of CCTA which is unsuitable for plaque and CFD analysis
  • Patients with ACS culprit lesion in a stented segment
  • Patients with previous history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery
  • Patients with revascularization after CCTA and before ACS event (*Patients with elective PCI for 1 vessel within 3 month after CCTA can be enrolled.
  • Secondary ACS due to other general medical conditions, such as sepsis, arrhythmia, bleeding, etc.
  • Patients with unstable angina without evidence of plaque rupture Additional exclusion criteria for Computational Fluid Dynamics
  • Poor quality CCTA images unsuitable for CFD and plaque analysis
  • No unprocessed CCTA data

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

discrimination index of prediction model

时间窗: 1 months - 3 years

discrimination index of prediction model

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Bon-Kwon Koo

Professor

Seoul National University Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验