NL-OMON36351CompletedPhase 4
A Multicenter, Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Study of the Repair of Challenging Abdominal Wall Defects: Strattice TM in abdominal Wall Repair (StaR) - StAR
KCI Europe Holding B.V.0 sites30 target enrollmentStarted: TBDLast updated:
Conditions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 30
Study Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 to 99 (—)
Inclusion Criteria
- •1) Adult (= > 18 years old)
- •2) Wirtten informed consent
- •3)Has need a surgical intervention of abdominal wall where:
- •a) The abdominal wall defect is considered to be (potentially) contaminated, but there is no manifest infection
- •b) Abdominal wall defect of a midline, transverse of Pfannenstiel incision
- •c) A significant abdominal wall defect of >= 3cm and < 22 cm in length (along axis of incision), and
- •d) In case of open abdomen (skin and fascia open), the viscera have been exposed no longer than 15 days
- •e) Is willing and able to return for all schedulded and required study visits
Exclusion Criteria
- •1) Has, at the time of Randomization (patient readay for abdominal wall closure)
- •a) severe systemic sepsis (demonstrable bacteremia and/or endotoxemia with hypo/hyperpyrexia, leukopenia/cytosis, tachypnea or hypocarbia, and/or tachycardia)
- •b) frank pus in the wound, a fistula that will not be closed at time of surgery or an intra-abdominal abscess in surgical area,
- •c) ongoing necrotizing pancreatitis, or
- •2) is on chronic immunosuppresive therapy, or other medication that influences wound healing
- •3) Requires only short-term closure (i.e. reentry is anticipated within the next week),
- •4) Requires a synthetic, non-absorbable mesh to close the abdominal wall defect
- •5) Is unable to undergo general anesthesia
- •6) Has serious medical risk factors involving any of the major organ systems such that the Investigator considers there to be serious risk of the subject not completing the study (e.g. AIDS or advanced cancer)
- •7) Is participating in another clinical study which may alter the postoperative healing response.
- •8) is unable to undergo on MRI scan (due to claustrophobia or other reasons)
Investigators
Similar Trials
Completed
Phase 3
A Prospective, Multicenter, Single Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing the Lutonix Drug Coated Balloon vs. Standard Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of Below-the-Knee (BTK) Arteries in Patients Undergoing HemodialysisSymptomatic occlusive disease of the peripheral arteriesJPRN-UMIN000014673Medicon Inc.36
Completed
Phase 3
A Prospective, Multicenter, Single Blind, Randomized, Controlled Japanese Population Trial Comparing MD02-LDCB vs. Standard Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of Femoropopliteal ArteriesSymptomatic occlusive disease of the peripheral arteriesJPRN-UMIN000010358Medicon Inc.105
Recruiting
Phase 4
This is an investigator initiated study to compare the safety and performance of the TUXEDO and XIENCE Prime stent system in the treatment of Coronary lesion in Diabetic Mellitus patient population in India.CTRI/2011/06/001830Fortis Escorts Heart institute and Research centre1,830
Completed
Not Applicable
A Single-center, Prospective, Non-blinded, Randomized, 12-month, Parallel-group, Superiority Study to Compare the Efficacy of Pharmacist Intervention versus Usual Care for Older Patients Hospitalized in the Orthopedic WardGeriatricsJPRN-UMIN000029404ational Hospital Organization Tochigi Medical Center220
Recruiting
Unknown
The efficacy and safety evaluation of partial meniscal transplantation using BIOMENISCUS GRAFT and partial meniscectomy in Meniscal Injury patientsKCT0009031Cellumed72
