Efficacy and Safety of TACE in Combination With ICIs for HCC: a Real-world Study
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Interventions
- Other: TACE+ICIsProcedure: TACE
- Registration Number
- NCT04975932
- Lead Sponsor
- Zhongda Hospital
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) .
- Detailed Description
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) can induce immunogenic cell death and tumor-specific immune response which results in the release of tumor antigens and transform "cold" tumors with lacking immune effector cells into "hot" tumors with immune effector cells infiltration. This provides a theoretical basis for TACE combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TACE in combination with ICIs in patients with HCC. This real-world study also explores the optimal combined treatment and outcome of HCC patients for providing further information for clinical practice and trials.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 826
- diagnosed with HCC by radiology, histology, or cytology;
- patients who underwent TACE combined with ICIs therapies ( with or without molecular targeted therapies) were included in the study group. For patients in the study group, ICIs therapies were received before the TACE or within 2 months after TACE and at least one cycle of immunotherapy has been received;
- during the same period, patients who underwent TACE without the combination of ICIs therapies ( with or without molecular targeted therapies) were included into the control group;
- patients who underwent TACE combined with ICIs therapies and molecular targeted therapies, molecular targeted therapies must be performed simultaneously with TACE or immunotherapy.
- exceeding the time interval of the combination therapy defined above;
- missing follow-up data;
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Study group: TACE+ICIs TACE+ICIs TACE: cTACE (conventional TACE) or dTACE (drug-eluting beads TACE); ICIs: atezolizumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, camrelizumab, tislelizumab, sintilimab or other ICIs Control group: TACE TACE TACE: cTACE (conventional TACE) or dTACE (drug-eluting beads TACE);
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Progression free survival(PFS) up to approximately 1 years The PFS is defined as the time from the initiation of any combination treatment to progression according to mRECIST or death from any cause. When pseudoprogression is suspected by investigator, tumor response will be re-assessed per iRECIST to confirm (also applicable for secondary endpoint of efficacy).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Adverse event(AE) baseline to end of study (approximately 2 years) Number and degree of the AEs according to CTCAE version 5.0.
Overall survival(OS) up to approximately 2 years The OS is defined as the time from the initiation of any combination treatment to death from any cause.
Time to Progression(TTP) up to approximately 1 years The TTP is defined as the time from the initiation of any combination treatment to progression according to mRECIST. When pseudoprogression is suspected by investigator, tumor response will be re-assessed per iRECIST to confirm.
Objective response rate(ORR) 6-8 week after TACE The ORR is defined as the proportion of patients with a documented complete response or partial response per mRECIST.
Disease control rate(DCR) 6-8 week after TACE The DCR is defined as the proportion of patients with a documented complete response, partial response, or stable disease according to mRECIST.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Gao-Jun Teng
🇨🇳Nanjing, China