跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01970826
NCT01970826Unknown不适用

Sterilized Aseptic Versus Sterilized Clean Field for Dental Implant Placement - Randomized Clinical Control Trial for Non-inferiority Comparison

Implantology Institute2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 80 人开始时间: 2014年1月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
发起方
入组人数
80
试验地点
2
主要终点
Osseointegration

研究概览

简要总结

In patients that require dental implants , does performing the surgery in clean sterile field compared to aseptic field, produces more post-operatory complications, implant morbidity or patient discomfort ?

详细描述

The investigators intend to compare two types of operatory room preparation (aseptic versus clean), used world wide, for placing dental implants.

The investigators want to see if it has impact on post-operatory healing, osseointegration and success rate of dental implants.

Before Study begins the investigators will perform inter-observer agreement in surgical preparation of the surgical suite, implant placements and operatory-room behavior.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • All surgeries schedule for implant placement

排除标准

  • Surgeries not made with local anesthesia

结局指标

主要结局

Osseointegration

时间窗: At 8 weeks (T2) after Baseline

Measure the ability of dental implants to integrate into bone in both groups (aseptic vs clean)

Post-Operatory Complications

时间窗: From Implant Placement (Baseline) to 4 weeks after (T1)

Measure the amount of adverse effects in both groups (aseptic vs clean) that happen between time frame baseline to 4 weeks.

次要结局

  • Marginal bone loss(At Final Restoration placement - Expected Average of 12 Weeks after baseline)
  • Patient Satisfaction(At 2 weeks)

研究者

发起方
Implantology Institute
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Andre Chen

Msc

Implantology Institute

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验