MedPath

Speeded Anomia Treatment in Chronic Post-stroke Aphasia

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Aphasia
Interventions
Behavioral: Speeded anomia therapy
Registration Number
NCT05512884
Lead Sponsor
University of Cambridge
Brief Summary

The main aim of the study is to investigate the effect of a novel, speeded anomia therapy (Conroy et al., 2018) in a large population of patients with chronic post-stroke aphasia. The treatment will be delivered via a web application (QuickWord).

Detailed Description

The main aim is to test the clinical efficacy of a novel, web based, rehabilitation approach to aphasic word-finding difficulties (QuickWord). In an initial development and case-series evaluation, Conroy et al (2018, Brain) found that training for both speed as well as accuracy of naming generated much better outcomes to picture naming accuracy and also augmented the carry-over to connected speech production.

This is a randomised, crossover, clinical trial of QuickWord in a group of aphasic patients in the chronic post-stroke period. The comparison will be standard care. The main outcome measures are clinically relevant improvement in naming to confrontation, and spontaneous use of the target vocabulary in a connected speech sample (detailed picture description). Secondary outcome includes measured use of the vocabulary in a story-telling, connected speech assessment (retelling of the Cinderella story).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • Native English speakers
  • Age 18 years or above
  • Stroke (any type) greater than 12 months post onset
  • No history of neurological disorders / psychiatric disorders
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal hearing & vision
  • Able to give informed consent
  • Currently not receiving Speech & Language therapy
  • Minimal repetition skills (>40% on an immediate word repetition test)
  • Evidence of naming difficulties (<90% in Boston Naming Test - Goodglass et al., 1983)
Exclusion Criteria
  • Non-native English speakers
  • Less than 18 years old
  • Stroke less than 12 months post onset
  • History of neurological disorders / psychiatric disorders
  • Uncorrected hearing & vision
  • Unable to give informed consent
  • Currently receiving Speech & Language therapy
  • Insufficient repetition skills (<40% on an immediate word repetition test)
  • Good naming performance (>90% in Boston Naming Test - Goodglass et al., 1983)

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Speeded anomia therapySpeeded anomia therapy21h of anomia therapy
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Speeded anomia therapy effect in reaction timeMeasured over 10 weeks (Week 0, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 10)

Change in reaction time in single-item picture naming

Speeded anomia therapy effect in accuracyMeasured over 10 weeks (Week 0, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 10)

Change in accuracy in single-item picture naming

Generalisation to connected speechMeasured over 10 weeks (Week 0, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 10)

Change in word retrieval in composite picture description. Participants will be asked to describe composite pictures (from the "Where's Waldo/Wally?" publications).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Generalisation to story-telling connected speechMeasured over 10 weeks (Week 0, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 10)

Change in narrative speech production. Participants will be asked to narrate the Cinderella story. A checklist with some of the most frequently used nouns (data obtained from AphasiaBank database) will be used.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit

🇬🇧

Cambridge, United Kingdom

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath