Complications Associated With Central Venous Access in the NSICU: PICC vs CVC
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- PICC
- Sponsor
- Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
- Enrollment
- 152
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Participants With Complications With Central Access Including Insertion
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 8 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to determine whether Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter or Centrally Inserted Venous Catheters have lower complication rates in the Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit. After admission to the Neuroscience ICU and if they require central access, patients will be randomized to receive a PICC or CVC and complications (such as pneumothorax, deep venous thrombosis, infection, etc.) will be tracked and compared between the two interventions.
Investigators
Chris Zacko
Assistant Professor of Neurosurgery
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Adult patients admitted to the NSICU, who require central access for the treatment of their illness.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Current or recent (within 1 month) diagnosis of bacteremia
- •Current or recent (within 1 year with confirmed resolution by imaging) deep venous thrombosis
- •Existing central access
- •Non-English speaking
- •Requirement for emergent central access and unable to obtain consent in an emergency setting
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Participants With Complications With Central Access Including Insertion
Time Frame: up to 10 weeks
Aggregation of all complications associated with central access including insertion
Secondary Outcomes
- Number of Participants With Deep Venous Thrombosis(up to 10 weeks)
- Number of Patients With Complications Related to Insertion(From the time of insertion until first confirmatory chest X-ray)
- Number of Participants With a Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infection(up to 10 weeks)