MedPath

Test of Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Sirolimus-Permanent-Polymer Eluting Stent (Cypher)- and Sirolimus-Polymer-free Eluting Stents (PPS/PFS) Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography

Phase 4
Conditions
Coronary Heart Disease
Interventions
Device: Sirolimus-Permanent-Polymer Eluting Stent
Device: Sirolimus-Polymer-free Eluting Stent
Registration Number
NCT01260558
Lead Sponsor
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
Brief Summary

The objective of this pilot study is to compare the PFS-eluting stent (ISAR Rapa G1) with the PPS-eluting stent (Cypher®) regarding uncovered stent strut segments at 5 years.

Detailed Description

The mid-term efficacy of drug-eluting stents has been well-established, but there is an ongoing debate on the potential of an increased incidence of late stent thrombosis, particularly after discontinuation of thienopyridine therapy, as well as of delayed onset of restenosis or catch-up phenomenon with permanent polymer-based DES. The extent of strut coverage with reduction of exposed thrombogenic material has been shown to be associated with the inflammatory reaction grade and with the incidence of stent thrombosis. The optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an intravascular imaging modality based on light. The principle is similar to intravascular ultrasound, but due to the much shorter wave length of light, it offers a much better resolution up to 10µm, enabling the exact determination of strut coverage, neointimal thickness, vessel size, presence of dissections, and even the presence of inflammation.

Patients who received a polymer-free or a permanent-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent about 5 years ago without in-segment intervention since, will be evaluated by OCT regarding the healing pattern and the late lumen loss of the stent.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients older than age 18 with with previous implantation of polymer-free or permanent-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents 5 years ago due to ischemic symptoms or evidence of myocardial ischemia in the presence of ≥ 50% stenosis located in native coronary vessels.
  • Written, informed consent by the patient or her/his legally-authorized representative for participation in the study and assessment by OCT.
  • In women with childbearing potential a negative pregnancy test is mandatory.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Intervention in the segment of the study stent after the index procedure
  • Target lesion located in the left main trunk.
  • In-stent restenosis with difficulty to pass the OCT device
  • Acute myocardial infarction
  • Known allergy to the study medications: Sirolimus, rapamycin, probucol or stainless steel.
  • Pregnancy (present, suspected or planned) or positive pregnancy test.
  • Patient's inability to fully cooperate with the study protocol.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Arm 1Sirolimus-Permanent-Polymer Eluting StentSirolimus-Permanent-Polymer Eluting Stent
Arm 2Sirolimus-Polymer-free Eluting StentSirolimus-Polymer-free Eluting Stent
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Degree of stent strut coverage after 5 years assessed by OCT for each visible strut segment5 years
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of malapposed strut assessed by OCT5 years
Percentage of uncovered malapposed struts assessed by OCT5 years
Morphologic differences of neointima between stents5 years
Late lumen loss at 5 years assessed by OCT5 years

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Klinikum rechts der Isar

🇩🇪

Munich, Bavaria, Germany

Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

🇩🇪

Munich, Bavaria, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath