Swedish Spinal Stenosis Study
- Conditions
- Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
- Interventions
- Procedure: Decompression without fusionProcedure: Decompression with fusion
- Registration Number
- NCT01994512
- Lead Sponsor
- Uppsala University
- Brief Summary
A national randomized multicentre trial (RCT) where decompression is compared with decompression with simultaneous fusion in 245 patients with spinal stenosis on one or two adjacent lumbar levels with or without degenerative olisthesis. The material is stratified for the existence of degenerative olisthesis \>3mm. Monitoring is performed with clinical results from patient surveys after 2 and five years, and with radiological follow-up (MRI, CT and plain X-ray) and an objective function test (6 min walking test) after 2 years. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in results between the two interventions.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 245
- Pseudoclaudication in one or both legs and backpain (VAS>30)
- MRI with 1-2 adjacent stenotic segments (area <0.75 mm2)between L2 and sacrum
- Duration of symptoms >6 months
- Informed consent
- Spondylolysis
- Degenerative lumbar scoliosis (Cobb angle >20 deg)
- History of lumbar spinal surgery for spinal stenosis or instability
- Stenosis not caused by degenerative changes
- Stenosis caused by herniated disc
- Other specific spinal conditions, Mb Bechterew, malignancy, neurologic disorders
- History of vertebral compression fractures in affected segments
- Psychological disorders where the surgeon considers participation inappropriate(dementia, drug abuse)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Decompression without fusion Decompression without fusion Surgery of the stenotic spinal segments with decompression of the neural elements without concommitant fusion. Decompression with fusion Decompression with fusion Surgery of the stenotic spinal segments with decompression of the neural elements with concommitant fusion.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) 2 years A difference in ODI of 12 at follow up between the two interventions is considered as significant.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method EuroQol (EQ-5D) 2 years Measurement of quality of life
Back pain 2 years The visual analog scale (VAS 0-100) is used the evaluate pain. A difference of 20 between the interventions is considered significant.
Leg pain 2 years The visual analog scale (VAS 0-100) is used the evaluate pain. A difference of 20 between the interventions is considered significant.
Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire 2 years A disease-specific self-report outcome instrument commonly used in trials to measure treatment outcomes in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. The Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire quantifies severity of symptoms, physical function characteristics, and patient's satisfaction after treatment. It was designed to complement existing generic measures of lumbar spine disability and health status in the evaluation of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.