MedPath

Effectiveness of Supervised Training Program on Mobility and Balance Confidence in Individual With Lower Limb Amputation

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Amputation
Interventions
Other: Gait Training
Registration Number
NCT05180682
Lead Sponsor
NCS University System
Brief Summary

It was quasi experimental study where the researchers assess the effectiveness of supervised training program on mobility and balance confidence in individual with lower limb amputation.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
46
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Age range 15-55 years.
  2. Both genders: (male and females).
  3. Trans-tibial amputation
  4. Patients involved in prosthetic rehabilitation (strengthening, balance training, stretching exercises and gait training).
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Patient with cognitive problem.
  2. Infection
  3. Neuromas
  4. Limb swelling

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Non-SupervisedGait TrainingThis group was non-supervised.
SupervisedGait TrainingThis group training was supervised by the health care provider.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Balance confidenceOne month

Balance was assessed through Activity-specific balance confidence. Its a 16-item questionnaire where patients' rate their confidence while doing activities.

Scoring from 0-100 (0 is no confidence and 100 is full confidence) Paper survey, 5-10 mins for administration. No Training required.

MobilityOne month

Mobility was assessed through loco-motor capabilities index. The loco-motor capabilities index is a disease-specific, self-administered instrument for assessing locomotor abilities generally considered essential for basic and advanced ADLs of people with lower-limb amputation and an enabling factor associated with long-term prosthetic use. It is easily administered and quickly completed.

It is composed of 14 questions The LCI can be divided into two 7-item subscales that cover basic (items 1, 4, 5, 8-11) and advanced (items 2, 3, 6, 7,12-14) activities, respectively. Higher scores reflect greater locomotor capabilities with the prosthesis and less dependence on assistance. Maximum score = 56, Minimum score = 0

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Pakistan Institute of Prosthetic and Orthotic Sciences, Peshawar

馃嚨馃嚢

Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

漏 Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath