Effectiveness of Supervised Training Program on Mobility and Balance Confidence in Individual With Lower Limb Amputation
- Conditions
- Amputation
- Interventions
- Other: Gait Training
- Registration Number
- NCT05180682
- Lead Sponsor
- NCS University System
- Brief Summary
It was quasi experimental study where the researchers assess the effectiveness of supervised training program on mobility and balance confidence in individual with lower limb amputation.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 46
- Age range 15-55 years.
- Both genders: (male and females).
- Trans-tibial amputation
- Patients involved in prosthetic rehabilitation (strengthening, balance training, stretching exercises and gait training).
- Patient with cognitive problem.
- Infection
- Neuromas
- Limb swelling
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Non-Supervised Gait Training This group was non-supervised. Supervised Gait Training This group training was supervised by the health care provider.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Balance confidence One month Balance was assessed through Activity-specific balance confidence. Its a 16-item questionnaire where patients' rate their confidence while doing activities.
Scoring from 0-100 (0 is no confidence and 100 is full confidence) Paper survey, 5-10 mins for administration. No Training required.Mobility One month Mobility was assessed through loco-motor capabilities index. The loco-motor capabilities index is a disease-specific, self-administered instrument for assessing locomotor abilities generally considered essential for basic and advanced ADLs of people with lower-limb amputation and an enabling factor associated with long-term prosthetic use. It is easily administered and quickly completed.
It is composed of 14 questions The LCI can be divided into two 7-item subscales that cover basic (items 1, 4, 5, 8-11) and advanced (items 2, 3, 6, 7,12-14) activities, respectively. Higher scores reflect greater locomotor capabilities with the prosthesis and less dependence on assistance. Maximum score = 56, Minimum score = 0
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Pakistan Institute of Prosthetic and Orthotic Sciences, Peshawar
馃嚨馃嚢Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan