Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05556876
NCT05556876CompletedNot Applicable

Effect of Oral Nutritional Supplements on Muscle Strength in Older Patients at Nutritional Risk Discharged With a Rehabilitation Plan

Herlev and Gentofte Hospital2 sites in 1 country123 target enrollmentStarted: December 1, 2023Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
123
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Leg Muscle strength

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to investigate whether an extra intake of energy and protein in the form of nutritional drinks twice a day for 12 weeks can improve muscle strength, muscle mass, quality of life and the implementation of rehabilitation in elderly patients at nutritional risk who are discharged to municipal rehabilitation

Detailed Description

The study is a single-blind randomised study where the subjects will be randomly divided into two groups. A group that must consume nutritional drinks in connection with their rehabilitation and a group that must do nothing extra. Based on a statistical power calculation, we will include a total of 124 patients.

In connection with the experiment, different data will be collected three times, in connection with the discharge from the hospital, after 6 weeks via the telephone and after 12 weeks. During a home visit. Here, various questionnaires will have to be answered and data on muscle strength and muscle mass will be collected. Further CRP, vitamin D status and EPA/DHA content in blood will be assessed.

In addition, data is collected from the patient's medical record about e.g. readmissions

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking Description

two set of files

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
65 Years to — (Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Men and women aged ≥ 65 years old
  • Independent stand function
  • Able to speak and understand Danish
  • At nutritional risk according to NRS-2002
  • (Expected to be) discharged with a new rehabilitation plan
  • Admitted to the medical and orthopaedic departments of Gentofte or Herlev Hospital

Exclusion Criteria

  • Active cancer
  • Renal insufficiency (eGFR < 27 mL/min/1.73m2)
  • Cognitive impairment (not able to comprehend the purpose of the study/give informed consent)
  • Terminal disease
  • Exclusively receiving texture modified food, enteral or parenteral nutrition
  • Planning to lose weight/go on a special diet
  • Planned transfer to other hospitals/departments
  • Pacemaker/other implanted electrical stimulants (due to Bio-Impedance Analysis (BIA)
  • Taking fish-oil supplements as a medical prescription due to hypertriglyceridemia
  • Taking fish-oil supplements for other reasons and do not wish to stop this during the study period

Arms & Interventions

Intervention

Active Comparator

the intervention group will be provided with oral nutritional supplements for 12 weeks after discharge

Intervention: Protein omega-3 (Dietary Supplement)

Control

No Intervention

the control group will receive usual care after discharge

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Leg Muscle strength

Time Frame: change from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up

Chair stand

Secondary Outcomes

  • Hand grip Muscle strength(change from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up)
  • Health related quality of life(Change from baseline to 6 and 12 weeks follow-up)
  • Activities of daily living(Change from baseline to 6 and 12 weeks follow-up)
  • energy and protein intake(at 12 weeks follow-up)
  • Appetite(Change from baseline to 12 week follow-up)
  • Muscle mass(Change from baseline to 12 week follow-up)
  • Frailty(Change from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up)
  • initiation and completion of rehabilitation(at 12 week follow-up)
  • readmissions(30 days and 38 weeks after discharge)
  • compliance to oral nutritional supplements(at 12 weeks follow-up)
  • mortality(30 days and 38 weeks after discharge)
  • inflammation(change from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up)
  • vitamin D status(change from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up)
  • Hydration status(Change from Baseline to 12 weeks follow up)
  • Hand grip Muscle strength(change from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up)
  • energy and protein intake(at 12 weeks follow-up)
  • Appetite(Change from baseline to 12 week follow-up)
  • Muscle mass(Change from baseline to 12 week follow-up)
  • Frailty(Change from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up)
  • initiation and completion of rehabilitation(at 12 week follow-up)
  • compliance to oral nutritional supplements(at 12 weeks follow-up)
  • inflammation(change from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up)
  • vitamin D status(change from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up)
  • Hydration status(Change from Baseline to 12 weeks follow up)
  • Health related quality of life(Change from baseline to 6 and 12 weeks follow-up)
  • Activities of daily living(Change from baseline to 6 and 12 weeks follow-up)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Anne Marie Beck

Senior researcher

Herlev and Gentofte Hospital

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials