Comparison of Catheter Plus Marshall Vein Ablation vs. Catheter Ablation Alone in Persistent AF With Heart Failure
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation, PersistentHeart Failure
- Interventions
- Procedure: Catheter Ablation Combined with Marshall Vein Ethanol Ablation
- Registration Number
- NCT06578793
- Lead Sponsor
- Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
- Brief Summary
This multicenter, randomized controlled trial aims to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of combining catheter ablation with Marshall vein ethanol ablation versus catheter ablation alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and concomitant heart failure. Persistent AF is a common arrhythmia that significantly impacts the quality of life and survival rates, especially when coexisting with heart failure. While catheter ablation is a standard treatment for AF, its effectiveness in persistent AF, particularly in patients with heart failure, remains suboptimal. The addition of Marshall vein ethanol ablation may enhance treatment outcomes by targeting arrhythmogenic substrates. This study will enroll 120 participants across three centers to evaluate whether this combined approach can reduce AF recurrence, improve heart function, and enhance patient outcomes compared to catheter ablation alone.
- Detailed Description
Persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) combined with heart failure presents a significant clinical challenge due to the high rates of morbidity and mortality associated with these conditions. Catheter ablation is widely used to manage AF, but its efficacy in persistent AF, particularly in patients with heart failure, is limited. Recent advances suggest that targeting the Marshall vein with ethanol ablation may offer additional benefits by disrupting critical pathways involved in AF maintenance.
This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy of combining Marshall vein ethanol ablation with standard catheter ablation compared to catheter ablation alone in a well-defined patient population. Conducted across three centers, this randomized controlled trial will rigorously assess whether the combined approach can offer superior outcomes, including lower AF recurrence rates and improved heart function. The study's findings are expected to contribute valuable insights into optimizing treatment strategies for this high-risk patient group.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 120
- Age between 18 and 80 years
- For symptomatic patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: At least a 6-month history of atrial fibrillation; atrial fibrillation duration exceeding 7 days without spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm; at least two episodes of persistent atrial fibrillation in the past 6 months even after rhythm conversion; poor tolerance or resistance to at least one Class I, II, or III antiarrhythmic drug
- Diagnosed with heart failure: Echocardiogram showing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%
- Patient willing to receive medication or surgical treatment
- Patient willing to comply with the requirements before the study, during the study, and during follow-up and to sign an informed consent form
- Capable of completing a 6-minute walk test
- For women of childbearing potential, a negative pregnancy test result is required
- Presence of thrombus in the left atrium
- Left atrial diameter greater than 65 millimeters in the parasternal long-axis view, or left atrial volume exceeding 200 milliliters as measured by MRI or CT
- Presence of significant congenital abnormalities or medical issues, deemed by the researcher as inappropriate for participation in the study
- Reversible causes of atrial fibrillation, such as pericarditis, thyroid disease, acute alcohol intoxication, recent major surgery, or trauma
- Currently suffering from valvular heart disease requiring surgical intervention
- Currently suffering from coronary artery disease requiring surgical or percutaneous intervention
- History of atrioventricular node ablation
- Liver failure
- Renal failure requiring dialysis
- Contraindicated use of appropriate anticoagulation therapy
- Participation in other experimental drug or device studies
- Severe pulmonary disease
- Previous catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in the left atrium
- Documented thromboembolic event within the past 90 days
- Pregnant women
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Catheter ablation combined with Marshall vein ethanol ablation group Catheter Ablation Combined with Marshall Vein Ethanol Ablation Participants in this group will undergo standard catheter ablation, which involves the isolation of the pulmonary veins and may include additional ablation of other atrial areas as necessary, guided by fluoroscopy and/or 3D electroanatomical mapping. In addition to the standard ablation procedure, participants will receive Marshall vein ethanol ablation. This involves the injection of absolute ethanol into the Marshall vein via a specialized catheter, aiming to ablate the vein's myocardial sleeves and adjacent autonomic fibers. The ethanol ablation targets arrhythmogenic substrates and aims to enhance the efficacy of the overall ablation procedure by reducing atrial fibrillation triggers. This combined approach is hypothesized to improve clinical outcomes by providing a more comprehensive treatment of atrial fibrillation substrates, particularly in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and concomitant heart failure. Catheter ablation alone group Catheter Ablation Combined with Marshall Vein Ethanol Ablation Participants in this group will undergo standard catheter ablation, which primarily involves the isolation of the pulmonary veins, a common trigger site for atrial fibrillation. The procedure may include additional ablation of other atrial areas based on the patient's specific arrhythmogenic substrate. The catheter ablation will be performed under fluoroscopic guidance and/or with the assistance of 3D electroanatomical mapping to ensure precision. This procedure is designed to eliminate or reduce the arrhythmogenic tissue within the atria to restore and maintain normal sinus rhythm. This intervention is the comparator arm in the study, representing the current standard treatment for persistent atrial fibrillation, particularly in patients with concomitant heart failure.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Freedom from Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter (AT/AF) Recurrence 12 months after the procedure The primary outcome is the proportion of participants who remain free from clinical recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFL) at follow-up. Recurrence is defined as the absence of documented AF/AFL episodes lasting 30 seconds or more during continuous ECG monitoring over a 1-month period.
Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) 12 months after the procedure This outcome assesses the change in LVEF as measured by echocardiography, reflecting the effect of the intervention on cardiac function.
Change in NT-proBNP Levels 12 months after the procedure This outcome measures the change in NT-proBNP levels, a biomarker for heart failure, from baseline to follow-up, indicating the impact of the intervention on heart failure status.
Change in 6-Minute Walk Test Distance 12 months after the procedure This outcome measures the change in the distance covered during the 6-minute walk test, an indicator of functional capacity and exercise tolerance.
Change in NYHA Functional Class 12 months after the procedure This outcome evaluates changes in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification, which assesses the severity of heart failure symptoms and functional limitations.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Presence or Absence of Palpitations Within 30 Days 30 days after the procedure This outcome measures whether palpitations related to the procedure occurred within 30 days post-intervention.
Presence or Absence of Bleeding Within 30 Days 30 days after the procedure This outcome measures whether bleeding related to the procedure occurred within 30 days post-intervention.
Presence or Absence of Mortality Within 30 Days 30 days after the procedure This outcome measures whether mortality related to the procedure occurred within 30 days post-intervention.
Total Number of Procedures Performed During the procedure(s) This outcome measures the total number of procedures performed during the intervention.
Atrial Fibrillation Burden at 6 Months 6 months after the procedure This outcome assesses the percentage of time that patients experience atrial fibrillation (AF) during continuous monitoring 6 months post-intervention.
Total Radiofrequency Ablation Time for the First Procedure During the first procedure This outcome measures the total radiofrequency ablation time during the first procedure.
Total Area of Left Atrial (LA) Tissue Ablated During the procedure(s) This outcome measures the total area of left atrial (LA) tissue ablated during the procedure(s).
Presence or Absence of Arrhythmias Within 30 Days 30 days after the procedure This outcome measures whether arrhythmias related to the procedure occurred within 30 days post-intervention.
Presence or Absence of Chest Tightness Within 30 Days 30 days after the procedure This outcome measures whether chest tightness related to the procedure occurred within 30 days post-intervention.
Atrial Fibrillation Burden at 12 Months 12 months after the procedure This outcome assesses the percentage of time that patients experience atrial fibrillation (AF) during continuous monitoring 12 months post-intervention.
Total Radiofrequency Ablation Time for the Second Procedure (if applicable) During the second procedure This outcome measures the total radiofrequency ablation time during the second procedure, if applicable.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
🇨🇳Changsha, Hunan, China