a Comparison of the Recurrence of Fistula in Ano After Video Assisted Fistulectomy VS. Loose Seton in Surgical Patients Having Fistula in Ano

Patients were equally allocated into two groups i.e. Group A & Group B by lottery method. In both groups, the lower bowel was emptied by an enema about an hour before the operation. All patients in Group A underwent the loose seton technique. The procedures were performed in the operating room with the patient in the lithotomy position. Probing of the fistula tract was done with a metallic malleable probe. The incision was given from the external opening of the fistula to the anal verge, involving the skin, subcutaneous tissue, superficial part of the external sphincter, and superficial part of the internal sphincter. After the insertion of loose Seton, a non-absorbable suture was left loosely and kept in situ for three months.

In group B, video-assisted fistula tract surgery (VAAFTS) was performed. The patients were positioned in the lithotomy position. The fistuloscope was then introduced into the external opening and the procedure was performed, except for the closure of the internal opening, which was performed with either a "figure of eight" suture or an advancement flap, rather than using a stapler. The tracts were destroyed using electrocautery, the necrotic tissues were removed, and the external openings were cored out and left open for drainage. The patients were discharged the day following the procedure. Twice daily Sitz baths, analgesics, and stool bulking agents (bran) were used in follow-up care. Repeated examinations were carried out every four weeks and recurrence was noted at the end of three months. The information (age, gender, duration of disease, BMI, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, place of living, and recurrence) was collected through pre-designed Performa (Annexure I).