Exploring New Approaches in Reaching Behavior Post Stroke
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Interventions
- Behavioral: stabilization trainingBehavioral: auditory training group
- Registration Number
- NCT00844870
- Lead Sponsor
- University of the Sciences in Philadelphia
- Brief Summary
After 4 weeks of training the hypothesis that the more natural training program would yield greater functional changes was proven correct.
- Detailed Description
Analysis indicated that both methods improved reaching without trunk use Reaching performance scale (RPS), but the trunk -stabilized group led to more significant changes. Training under less restrictive conditions associated with Task-Related Training (TRT) (auditory feedback from trunk sensor) as compared to stabilized TRT, led to improved functional and impairment measure scores (WMFT, FM and shoulder flexion). Conclusion: Fading feedback with both training methods, during extended TRT reaching/grasping practice generally led to some improvements. However, as demonstrated by impairment and functional outcome measures, using TRT with an auditory feedback signals is a more effective approach than forcing the stabilization of the trunk during rehabilitation of the upper-limb.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 24
- Individuals all scored between 20 and 44 on the Upper-Arm subsection of the Fugl-Meyer Scale (FM- Poole & Whitney, 1988) and demonstrated some trunk movement during the pretest reaching performance scale measures (RPS, Levin 2006)
- Individuals were referred if they had no receptive aphasia, apraxia or other cognitive deficits.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 1 stabilization training stabilization training group 2 auditory training group auditory response training group
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method WMFT 1 year
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method FM and shoulder flexion 1 year