跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07271329
NCT07271329尚未招募不适用

Risk-stratification of Emergency Department Suspected Sepsis (REDS) Score Versus Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) Score to Predict Mortality in Patients With Suspected Sepsis

Assiut University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 80 人开始时间: 2025年12月1日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
80
试验地点
1
主要终点
Primary outcome

研究概览

简要总结

Our goal in this work is to compare the predictive accuracy of the REDS score versus qSOFA in identifying in-hospital mortality among ED patients with suspected sepsis and improving outcomes in ED patients.

详细描述

Sepsis is a life threatening condition and a major cause of morbidity and mortality in emergency department worldwide.Patients at high-risk of death may be identified by using an evidence based risk-stratification score. The ED is a busy and hard environment and any score that is used should be easy to calculate using readily available variables. The objective criteria defining sepsis, a minimum two-point increase as in qSoFA score .

The REDS (Risk-stratification of Emergency Department suspected Sepsis) score is a tool used to assess the risk of mortality in patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department. It combines several factors including age, altered mental state, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, serum albumin, INR, lactate levels, and refractory hypotension. A score of 3 or more is considered high-risk. Our goal in this work is to compare the predictive accuracy of the REDS score versus qSOFA in identifying in-hospital mortality among ED patients with suspected sepsis and improving outcomes in ED patients.

The REDS score includes the following variables, each assigned a point value:

Age: ≥ 65 years old (1 point) Altered Mental State: (1 point) Respiratory Rate: ≥ 22 breaths/min (1 point) Systolic Blood Pressure: ≤ 100 mm Hg (1 point) Serum Albumin: ≤ 27 g/L (1 point) INR: ≥ 1.3 (1 point) Lactate: 2.1-3.9 mmol/L (1 point), ≥ 4 mmol/L (3 points) Refractory Hypotension: (2 points for lactate ≤ 2 mmol/L, 3 points for lactate >2 mmol/L)

Interpreting the REDS score:

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Adults ≥ 18 y presented to the ED with suspected or confirmed infection, both sex qSOFA criterion met on arrival ≥ 2

排除标准

  • Patient less than 18 years Incomplete vital sign records upon ED arrival Pregnant patients Those with DNR state Immune compromised patient as leukemia

结局指标

主要结局

Primary outcome

时间窗: 30 day

primary outcome will be mortality during the 30 day follow-up

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

MN MohamedHussin

Resident at Emergency Department

Assiut University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验