Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00233233
NCT00233233CompletedNot Applicable

Assessment Mode and Validity of Self-Reports in Adults

Johns Hopkins University1 site in 1 country139 target enrollmentStarted: August 1, 2002Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
139
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Concordance between patient's self-reported medication adherence and electronically measured adherence

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study will examine how the assessment mode influences the validity of self-reported adherence to asthma therapy. Self-reported adherence to asthma therapy data will be collected using one of three randomized assessment modes (interview, computer, or telephone).

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND:

Self-reports are a primary source of behavioral data. Studies have highlighted the variable validity and reliability of self-report measures of health behaviors such as adherence to therapy. Research on self-reports of sensitive information, such as sexual behavior and drug use, suggests that the mode of data collection may enhance validity of self-reports. However, no studies have determined how the mode of data collection influences self-reports when an objective measure of the behavior is available.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

The primary aim of this study is to examine the influence of the mode of data collection on the validity of self-reports of inhaled anti-inflammatory medication adherence.

The key secondary outcomes of the study will attempt to answer the following questions: 1) does the assessment mode influence self-reports of commonly used asthma outcome measures of disease-related symptoms, self-management behaviors, and quality of life?; 2) does the relationship between the assessment mode, the validity of self-reports of adherence, and other measures (i.e., asthma symptoms, self-management behaviors, and quality of life) change over time?; and 3) does the assessment mode interact with baseline personality characteristics and mood to influence the validity of self-reports of adherence and other outcome measures (i.e., asthma symptoms, self-management behaviors, and quality of life)?

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
19 Years to 95 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Diagnosis of asthma
  • •Under a provider's care for asthma
  • •Prescribed daily inhaled corticosteroids (by metered dose inhaler [MDI]) at least 2 times a day
  • •Speaks English
  • •Otherwise in good general health

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Concordance between patient's self-reported medication adherence and electronically measured adherence

Time Frame: Measured at Months 1 through 5

Secondary Outcomes

  • Impact of mode of assessment on adult self-reports of asthma symptoms, asthma management practices, and quality of life(Measured at Months 1 through 5)
  • Relationship between baseline measures of psychosocial variables (i.e., personality and mood) and the primary outcome(Measured at Months 1 through 5)

Investigators

Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials