Independent Weight Loss Maintenance for Communities With Arthritis in North Carolina: the I-CAN Clinical Trial
- Conditions
- Osteo Arthritis Knee
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Health Education (Attention Control)Behavioral: Weight-Loss Maintenance
- Registration Number
- NCT03832296
- Lead Sponsor
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences
- Brief Summary
The study team is currently conducting a pragmatic, community-based assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) in overweight and obese adults \> 50 years with knee OA in both urban and rural counties in North Carolina. As the participants randomized to the 18 month diet and exercise group in the WE-CAN study successfully complete the intervention (≥ 5% weight loss), the study team has the unique opportunity to evaluate the effectiveness of a theoretically-based tapered weight maintenance intervention. Eligible participants will be randomized to either the weight-loss maintenance or health education attention control groups.
- Detailed Description
Results from the Intensive Diet and Exercise for Arthritis (IDEA) trial showed that 10% diet-induced weight loss combined with exercise (D+E) was twice as effective at relieving knee pain and improving function and mobility as previous long-term weight loss and exercise programs in similar cohorts. The treatment effects of D+E on these clinical outcomes were mediated by changes in self-efficacy over the course of the trial. However, most people tend to regain most or all of the lost weight in three to five years. The challenge is maintaining the weight loss and sustaining the efficacy of the intervention.
Our current trial (WE-CAN) is designed to adapt the successful IDEA intervention to real-world clinical and community settings. As WE-CAN participants in the D+E group complete their intervention, the investigators will leverage our organizational infrastructure to maintain weight-loss without supervised intervention by increasing participant confidence to establish and adhere to a routine of good exercise and diet behaviors independently.
Participants will include 212 older adults aged ≥ 51 yrs. with knee osteoarthritis (OA) who achieved a weight loss ≥ 5% in the D+E intervention arm of the WE-CAN trial. All WE-CAN participants meet the ACR clinical criteria for knee OA, which includes knee pain on most days of the week plus at least three of the following six: age ≥ 50 years, stiffness \< 30 min/day, crepitus, bony tenderness, bony enlargement, and/or no palpable warmth. Eligible WE-CAN D+E participants will be randomized to either 6-month facilitated weight-loss maintenance or health education control interventions. The primary aim is to compare the effects of a 6-month weight-loss maintenance intervention grounded in social cognitive theory to a health education intervention on maintaining weight loss subsequent to a 12-month unsupervised follow-up period. Secondary aims will compare the two interventions on WOMAC knee pain and function, health-related quality of life (SF-36), 6-minute walk distance, and weight-loss maintenance self-efficacy following the 12-month unsupervised period. The study team will also establish the cost-effectiveness of a 6-month facilitated weight-loss maintenance intervention for older adults with knee OA by conducting cost-effectiveness and budgetary impact analyses using data from the current trial in a validated computer-simulated model of knee OA.
There have been numerous attempts to prevent weight regain in adults. This study is significant in that it is designed to encourage older adults with knee OA that have experienced significant weight loss to develop strategies that will build self-efficacy for maintaining weight loss on their own long after the active intervention ends.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 105
- age ≥ 51
- achieved a weight loss ≥ 5% in the D+E intervention arm of the WE-CAN trial
- Weight loss < 5% of baseline body weight
- Significant co-morbid disease that would threaten safety or impair ability to participate in interventions or testing (Blindness; Type 1 diabetes; Severe coronary artery disease)
- Inability to finish 18-month study or unlikely to be compliant (Planning to leave area > 2 month during the next 18 months)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Health Education (Attention Control) Health Education (Attention Control) Health Education Intervention Weight-Loss Maintenance Weight-Loss Maintenance Weight Loss Maintenance Intervention
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Weight-Loss Maintenance 18 Months Compare the effects of a 6-month weight-loss maintenance intervention grounded in social cognitive theory to a health education intervention on maintaining weight loss subsequent to a 12-month unsupervised follow-up period.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Knee Pain measured by the WOMAC Index 18 Months The investigators will measure self-reported pain using the WOMAC (scores will be pulled from the KOOS Questionnaire in which the WOMAC is embedded). The pain index assesses participants' pain on a scale, ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme). The pain subscale consists of 5 items and total scores can range from 0-20, with larger scores indicating greater dysfunction.
Function measured by the WOMAC Index 18 Months The investigators will measure self-reported physical function using the WOMAC (scores will be pulled from the KOOS Questionnaire in which the WOMAC is embedded). The LK version asks participants to indicate on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme) the degree of difficulty experienced in the last week due to knee OA. Individual scores for the 17 items are totaled to generate a summary score that could range from 0-68, with higher scores indicating poorer function.
Health Related Quality of Life: SF-36 18 Months Compare the effects of a 6-month weight-loss maintenance intervention grounded in social cognitive theory to a health education intervention on health-related quality of life (SF-36) subsequent to a 12-month unsupervised follow-up period. Two summary scores are acquired: physical health and mental health. Range=0-100. Higher scores indicate better health.
Self-Efficacy - Gait Efficacy - gait efficacy/environmental efficacy scale 18 Months Compare the effects of a 6-month weight-loss maintenance intervention grounded in social cognitive theory to a health education intervention on self-efficacy. The gait efficacy/environmental efficacy scale will ask the participants' confidence in performing certain activities. Confidence in performing activities. Participants will be asked to indicate their level of confidence being able to complete different tasks. Range=0-100. A higher score indicates higher self-efficacy.
Self-Efficacy - Perceived Stress: questionnaire 18 Months Compare the effects of a 6-month weight-loss maintenance intervention grounded in social cognitive theory to a health education intervention on self-efficacy. The perceived stress questionnaire will measure the degree to which people perceive their lives as stressful. Range = 0-40. Higher numbers indicate higher stress.
Self-Efficacy - Adherence Self Efficacy Scale 18 Months Compare the effects of a 6-month weight-loss maintenance intervention grounded in social cognitive theory to a health education intervention on self-efficacy. The adherence questionnaire is designed to assess beliefs in one's ability (confidence) to continue exercising at various intensities and frequencies. Range=0-100. A higher score indicates higher self-efficacy.
Cost-Effectiveness- WPAI 18 Months The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment index (WPAI) will be used to assess absenteeism and reduced productivity while at work (presenteeism). Outcome (OC) scores can be derived from the WPAI: OC1, percent work time missed due to health, (percentage of absenteeism); percent impairment while working due to health, (percentage of presenteeism); percent overall work impairment due to health, percent activity impairment due to health. For all 4 outcomes, greater scores (range 0-100%) indicate greater impact of health.
Self-Efficacy - PANAS 18 Months Compare the effects of a 6-month weight-loss maintenance intervention grounded in social cognitive theory to a health education intervention on self-efficacy. The Positive and Negative Affect (PANAS) measures both positive and negative affect, leading to more insightful outlooks regarding participants' feeling states. This scale consists of 20 items that reflect the intensity of how the participant "feels" right now. Range=10-50 for each subscale. A higher score for positive affect indicates a higher level of positive affect. A higher score for negative affect indicates a higher level of negative affect.
Self-Efficacy - Weight Efficacy Scale 18 Months Compare the effects of a 6-month weight-loss maintenance intervention grounded in social cognitive theory to a health education intervention on self-efficacy. The Weight Efficacy Lifestyle Questionnaire (WEL) is a 20-item measure employed to assess self-efficacy for weight management. Range=0 to 180. Higher numbers indicate better confidence.
Self-Efficacy - Weight Loss Maintenance: questionnaire 18 Months Compare the effects of a 6-month weight-loss maintenance intervention grounded in social cognitive theory to a health education intervention on self-efficacy for maintaining weight loss. Range=0-100. Higher scores indicate more confidence in maintaining weight loss.
Mobility- 6 minute walk test 18 Months The primary mobility measure will be 6-minute walk distance. Participants are told to walk as far as possible in 6 minutes on an established course.
Self-Efficacy - Walking Efficacy for Duration: walking efficacy for duration scale 18 Months Compare the effects of a 6-month weight-loss maintenance intervention grounded in social cognitive theory to a health education intervention on self-efficacy. The walking efficacy for duration scale measures one's ability to walk/jog at a moderately fast pace for various durations. Range 0-100. A higher score indicates a higher self-efficacy.
Self-Efficacy - Satisfaction with Life: Satisfaction with life scale 18 Months Compare the effects of a 6-month weight-loss maintenance intervention grounded in social cognitive theory to a health education intervention on self-efficacy. The Satisfaction with life scale is focused to assess global life satisfaction. Range=5 to 35. A higher scale indicates a higher level of life satisfaction.
Self-Efficacy - Perceived Barriers: questionnaire 18 Months Compare the effects of a 6-month weight-loss maintenance intervention grounded in social cognitive theory to a health education intervention on self-efficacy. The perceived barriers questionnaire measures a person's perceptions to barriers to performing exercise. The questionnaire is scored by finding the mean for each response (range = 1-5). Higher scores indicate higher perception of barriers.
Self-Efficacy - Barriers Self-Efficacy to Exercise 18 Months Compare the effects of a 6-month weight-loss maintenance intervention grounded in social cognitive theory to a health education intervention on self-efficacy. The Barriers Self-Efficacy to Exercise measures confidence in dealing with barriers to exercise. Range=0-100. Higher numbers indicate higher confidence.
Cost-Effectiveness 18 Months Resource utilization will be collected by questionnaire. MD and non-MD office visits will be collected via self-report with domains including visits to clinicians (physicians, nurses, physical therapists, others), tests, medications, injections, surgery, alternative therapies. The number of visits associated with utilization of each of 4 domains, MD visits, non-MD visits, ED visits, and inpatient stays, will be examined.
Self-Efficacy - Multidimensional Outcome Expectations for Exercise Scale (MOEES): questionnaire 18 Months Compare the effects of a 6-month weight-loss maintenance intervention grounded in social cognitive theory to a health education intervention on self-efficacy. The MOEES questionnaire consists of three subscales: physical outcome expectations (score range 6-30), social outcome expectations (score range 4-20), and self-evaluative outcome expectations (score range 5-25). Each subscale is scored by summing the numerical ratings for each response. Higher scores are indicative of higher levels of outcome expectations for exercise.
Trial Locations
- Locations (3)
Johnston County - UNC Chapel Hill
🇺🇸Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Forsyth County - Wake Forest University/Wake Forest University Health Sciences
🇺🇸Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Haywood County - Haywood Regional Medical Center
🇺🇸Clyde, North Carolina, United States