Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04847765
NCT04847765CompletedNot Applicable

A Pilot Study to Assess the Procedural Feasibility to Combine and Compare Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging and an Isovolumetric Intragastric Balloon to Assess Gastric Contractility in Healthy Adults

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven1 site in 1 country2 target enrollmentStarted: April 21, 2021Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
2
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Time of gastric contractions identified by means of the investigational medical device

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Previous research by TARGID (KU Leuven) has demonstrated the feasibility to assess gastric content volume by means of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) while simultaneously evaluating gastric motor function by means of an isovolumetric balloon technique. This and other research concluded that in general, the motility readout of the isovolumetric balloon is associated with gastric contractions.

However, the exact relation between individual gastric contractions and individual intraballoon pressure waves remains incompletely understood.

Simultaneous assessment of gastric motility by means of an isovolumetric balloon and dynamic cine-MRI can validate that slow, high-amplitude intraballoon pressure waves are indeed induced by gastric muscle contractions. This evaluation might also enable us to attribute artefacts present in the pressure signal to physiologic processes such as cardiac, respiratory, intestinal and whole-body movements.

To date substantial uncertainty exists on the optimal procedural approach to evaluate gastric motility simultaneously with cine-MRI and the isovolumetric balloon.

The aim of this pilot study is to verify the feasibility of a several aspects of a larger confirmatory study protocol. This includes the evaluation of contrast of the balloon catheter on MRI (this would omit the need for radiographic confirmation), timelines, practical hurdles, analysis procedures and data management.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Na
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Device Feasibility
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
Male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Signed Informed Consent
  • At least 18 years old
  • BMI between and including 18 and 30
  • Understand and able to read Dutch
  • In good health on the basis of medical history

Exclusion Criteria

  • Using any medication that might affect gastric function or visceral sensitivity
  • Known / suspected current use of illicit drugs
  • Known psychiatric or neurological illness
  • Any gastrointestinal surgery that could influence normal gastric function in the opinion of the Investigator
  • History of heart or vascular diseases like irregular heartbeats, angina or heart attack
  • Nasopharyngeal surgery in the last 30 days
  • History of thermal or chemical injury to upper respiratory tract or esophagus
  • Current esophageal or nasopharyngeal obstruction
  • Known coagulopathy
  • Known esophageal varices
  • Metal or other MRI incompatible implants
  • Contra-indications for MR (checked by MR safety questionnaire)
  • Claustrophobia

Arms & Interventions

Combined pressure measurement and MRI

Experimental

Gastric motility is evaluated simultaneously by means of the investigational medical device and by means of cine-MRI.

Intervention: VIPUN Gastric Monitoring System prototype (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Time of gastric contractions identified by means of the investigational medical device

Time Frame: 30 minutes

Analysis software filters the pressure signal and identifies individual gastric contractions. The exact time at which each contraction is detected within a 30-minute recording period is documented.

Gastric contractions identified visually by an expert radiologist

Time Frame: 30 minutes

The exact time at which each gastric contractile event is most clearly visible within a 30-minute recording period is documented.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials