Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00294528
NCT00294528UnknownPhase 4

Comparing Clinical Outcome of 2 Different Total Knee Prostheses: Nexgen LPS-Flex and AGC

Hvidovre University Hospital1 site in 1 country100 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2004Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 4
Enrollment
100
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Satisfaction

Study Overview

Brief Summary

A randomized blinded study is conducted comparing 2 different knee prostheses. Range of motion (ROM), pain, feel of prosthesis, satisfaction and ability to do daily activities are registered at intervals up to one year postop, where patients are informed on which prosthesis they received.

We want to:

  • determine whether an increased ROM is achieved with a high-flex knee compared to a standard knee
  • and if so, does it matter

Detailed Description

100 patients operated on with unilateral TKR are included and randomized to either prostheses.

Patients operated on with bilateral simultaneous TKR receive one of each prostheses but are blinded to which prosthesis is on which side. They have gait analyses performed preop and at intervals up to one year.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •age below 75 years and active
  • •preop ROM at least 120 degress flexion
  • •BMI below 30
  • •intact ligaments

Exclusion Criteria

  • •below 18 years
  • •unable to understand language or purpose

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Satisfaction

ROM

Pain

Feel of prosthesis

Gait analysis

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials