Randomised controlled study of physiological” peritoneal dialysis solutions. - Physiological PD
- Conditions
- End stage renal failure
- Registration Number
- EUCTR2005-004360-23-GB
- Lead Sponsor
- Barts and The London NHS Trust
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 0
All incident patients selected to use a PD system that has physiological and standard solutions available.
Are the trial subjects under 18? no
Number of subjects for this age range:
F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes
F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range
F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes
F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range
-Patients unable to provide informed consent
-Patients where the use of a certain solution is indicated or contra-indicated for medical reasons (e.g. known allergy).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional clinical trial of medicinal product
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Main Objective: To compare the outcome of peritoneal dialysis when standard or biocompatible solutions are used. Primary end-point is: peritonitis rate. ;Secondary Objective: Secondary Endpoints:<br>·Patients using physiological solutions will have better preservation of residual kidney function.<br>·Patients using physiological solutions will have smaller changes in peritoneal membrane function assessed by PET than control<br>·Patients using physiological solutions will have reduced composite end-point of mortality and PD failure defined by transfer to HD<br>·Patients using physiological solutions will have better quality of life assessed by SF-36<br>;Primary end point(s): Primary aim is to compare peritonitis. However, some patients may have more than 1 episode
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method