Comparison of weight based to thenar eminence size based insertion of igel in paediatric patients.
Phase 2
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and SurgicalHealth Condition 2: R688- Other general symptoms and signs
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/02/031494
- Lead Sponsor
- KIMS
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
ASA grade 1 and grade 2.
Patients belonging to either sex.
Scheduled to undergo various short surgical procedures under General anaesthesia using I-gel.
Patients giving informed written consent .
Exclusion Criteria
Patients with suspected airway difficulty( mallampati grade 3 and grade 4)
Significant cardiovascular pulmonary and liver diseases
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Alternate method of selection of i-gel, which can be applied in cases where the weight of the patient is not known and where the weight is not a reliable factor and can be applied in emergency cases. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: The percentage of successful insertion of i-gel . <br/ ><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the ease of insertion and adverse events in thenar eminence size based selection of i-gel in terms of time taken for insertion of i-gel or adverse events associated with insertion of i-gel like coughing, gagging, etc.Timepoint: 2 years