MedPath

Multilevel HPV Self-Testing Intervention for the Increase of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women in Appalachia

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Human Papillomavirus Infection
Cervical Carcinoma
Interventions
Other: Best Practice
Procedure: HPV Self-Collection
Other: Informational Intervention
Behavioral: Patient Navigation Program
Registration Number
NCT04411849
Lead Sponsor
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Brief Summary

This trial studies how well a multilevel human papillomavirus (HPV) self-testing intervention works in increasing cervical cancer screening among women in Appalachia. Most cases of cervical cancer occur among unscreened and underscreened women. A multilevel HPV self-testing intervention may help to improve cervical cancer screening rates.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

Determine the effectiveness of the intervention in increasing cervical cancer screening.

OUTLINE: Participants are randomized to 1 of 2 groups.

GROUP I: Participants receive the HPV self-testing intervention consisting of mailed HPV self-test devices. Participants also receive an information about cervical cancer. Participants who do not return their self-test within a few weeks receive telephone-based patient navigation.

GROUP II: Participants receive usual care consisting of a reminder letter to get a clinic-based cervical cancer screening test and information about cervical cancer.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
802
Inclusion Criteria
  • Not within recommended cervical cancer screening guidelines for women in this age range (i.e., no Papanicolaou [Pap] test in last 3 years or no Pap test plus clinic-based HPV test in last 5 years)
  • Resident of an Appalachian county
  • Not currently pregnant
  • Intact cervix
  • No history of invasive cervical cancer
  • Seen in a participating clinic/health system in last 2 years (i.e., active patient)
  • Have a working telephone
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group II (usual care continued)HPV Self-CollectionParticipants receive usual care consisting of a reminder letter to get a clinic-based cervical cancer screening test and information about cervical cancer.
Group II (usual care continued)Patient Navigation ProgramParticipants receive usual care consisting of a reminder letter to get a clinic-based cervical cancer screening test and information about cervical cancer.
Group I (intervention)Informational InterventionParticipants receive the HPV self-testing intervention consisting of mailed HPV self-test devices. Participants also receive an information about cervical cancer. Participants who do not return their self-test within a few weeks receive telephone-based patient navigation.
Group II (usual care continued)Best PracticeParticipants receive usual care consisting of a reminder letter to get a clinic-based cervical cancer screening test and information about cervical cancer.
Group I (intervention)HPV Self-CollectionParticipants receive the HPV self-testing intervention consisting of mailed HPV self-test devices. Participants also receive an information about cervical cancer. Participants who do not return their self-test within a few weeks receive telephone-based patient navigation.
Group I (intervention)Patient Navigation ProgramParticipants receive the HPV self-testing intervention consisting of mailed HPV self-test devices. Participants also receive an information about cervical cancer. Participants who do not return their self-test within a few weeks receive telephone-based patient navigation.
Group II (usual care continued)Informational InterventionParticipants receive usual care consisting of a reminder letter to get a clinic-based cervical cancer screening test and information about cervical cancer.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Effectiveness of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) InterventionUp to 1 years

The patient-level effectiveness will be whether or not women get "screened" during the project. Will examine the proportion of women screened, and use an intent-to-treat approach. To compare treatment groups (Group 1 versus Group 2), will use generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) to account for the correlation between women from the same health system.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (4)

University of Kentucky/Markey Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Columbus, Ohio, United States

University of Virginia

🇺🇸

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

West Virginia University

🇺🇸

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath