Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04411849
NCT04411849CompletedNot Applicable

A Multilevel HPV Self-Testing Intervention to Increase Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women in Appalachia

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center4 sites in 1 country802 target enrollmentStarted: August 27, 2021Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
802
Locations
4
Primary Endpoint
Effectiveness of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Intervention

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This trial studies how well a multilevel human papillomavirus (HPV) self-testing intervention works in increasing cervical cancer screening among women in Appalachia. Most cases of cervical cancer occur among unscreened and underscreened women. A multilevel HPV self-testing intervention may help to improve cervical cancer screening rates.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

Determine the effectiveness of the intervention in increasing cervical cancer screening.

OUTLINE: Participants are randomized to 1 of 2 groups.

GROUP I: Participants receive the HPV self-testing intervention consisting of mailed HPV self-test devices. Participants also receive an information about cervical cancer. Participants who do not return their self-test within a few weeks receive telephone-based patient navigation.

GROUP II: Participants receive usual care consisting of a reminder letter to get a clinic-based cervical cancer screening test and information about cervical cancer.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Screening
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
30 Years to 64 Years (Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Not within recommended cervical cancer screening guidelines for women in this age range (i.e., no Papanicolaou [Pap] test in last 3 years or no Pap test plus clinic-based HPV test in last 5 years)
  • •Resident of an Appalachian county
  • •Not currently pregnant
  • •Intact cervix
  • •No history of invasive cervical cancer
  • •Seen in a participating clinic/health system in last 2 years (i.e., active patient)
  • •Have a working telephone

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Arms & Interventions

Group I (intervention)

Experimental

Participants receive the HPV self-testing intervention consisting of mailed HPV self-test devices. Participants also receive an information about cervical cancer. Participants who do not return their self-test within a few weeks receive telephone-based patient navigation.

Intervention: HPV Self-Collection (Procedure)

Group I (intervention)

Experimental

Participants receive the HPV self-testing intervention consisting of mailed HPV self-test devices. Participants also receive an information about cervical cancer. Participants who do not return their self-test within a few weeks receive telephone-based patient navigation.

Intervention: Informational Intervention (Other)

Group I (intervention)

Experimental

Participants receive the HPV self-testing intervention consisting of mailed HPV self-test devices. Participants also receive an information about cervical cancer. Participants who do not return their self-test within a few weeks receive telephone-based patient navigation.

Intervention: Patient Navigation Program (Behavioral)

Group II (usual care continued)

Active Comparator

Participants receive usual care consisting of a reminder letter to get a clinic-based cervical cancer screening test and information about cervical cancer.

Intervention: Best Practice (Other)

Group II (usual care continued)

Active Comparator

Participants receive usual care consisting of a reminder letter to get a clinic-based cervical cancer screening test and information about cervical cancer.

Intervention: Informational Intervention (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Effectiveness of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Intervention

Time Frame: Up to 1 years

The patient-level effectiveness will be whether or not women get "screened" during the project. Will examine the proportion of women screened, and use an intent-to-treat approach. To compare treatment groups (Group 1 versus Group 2), will use generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) to account for the correlation between women from the same health system.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Paul Reiter

Principal Investigator

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Study Sites (4)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials