Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04643145
NCT04643145Active, not recruitingNot Applicable

Optimal Drainage After Flexible Ureterorenoscopy; Prospective Assessment of Perioperative Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life Through a Randomized Controlled Trial

Mansoura University2 sites in 1 country130 target enrollmentStarted: March 1, 2020Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Active, not recruiting
Enrollment
130
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Stone free rate

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Flexible ureterorenoscopy (FURS) is now recommended for the treatment of kidney stones smaller than 20 mm, as an alternative to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and in combination with percutanous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for stones larger than 20 mm. At the end of the operation, a ureteral drainage is put in place for the treatment of residual fragments and the inflammation following the ureteroscopy. It helps prevent obstructive symptoms and the development of strictures.

Drainage is done either by a ureteral catheter or by a double J stent. In the literature, while drainage after ureteroscopy is recommended, the criteria for choosing between these two options are not clearly defined.

The objective of this study will be to assess whether the type of postoperative drainage after URS for kidney stones can influence the perioperative outcomes and health-related quality of life.

Detailed Description

Flexible ureterorenoscopy (FURS) is now recommended for the treatment of kidney stones smaller than 20 mm, as an alternative to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and in combination with percutanous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for stones larger than 20 mm. At the end of the operation, a ureteral drainage is put in place for the treatment of residual fragments and the inflammation following the ureteroscopy. It helps prevent obstructive symptoms and the development of strictures.

Drainage is done either by a ureteral catheter or by a double J stent. In the literature, while drainage after ureteroscopy is recommended, the criteria for choosing between these two options are not clearly defined.

The objective of this study will be to assess whether the type of postoperative drainage after URS for kidney stones can influence the perioperative outcomes and health-related quality of life.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • 1- Adult patients (aged >18 years) 2- Undergo unilateral uncomplicated retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) using flexible ureterorenoscopy.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Residual ureteral or renal stones after the procedure as documented by the surgeon
  • Patients who will need auxiliary procedures (ESWL , re-FURS or PCNL)
  • Preoperative febrile UTI
  • pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Bilateral ureteroscopic surgery
  • Single kidney
  • Chronic kidney disease
  • Cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease
  • Hepatic dysfunction
  • Other acute medical conditions as acute gastroenteritis, osetoarthritis that might influence the patient QoL

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Stone free rate

Time Frame: 12 weeks after the procedure

presence of residual fragments on non contrast computed tomography

Secondary Outcomes

  • perioperative complications(First 3 days postoperative)
  • Postoperative pain by visual analogue scale(first 24 hours postoperatively)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Amr Abdel-Lateif El-Sawy

Principal Investigator

Mansoura University

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials