MedPath

Pulsenmore ES Device, Efficacy and Safety Assessment

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Perinatal Care
Interventions
Device: Pulsenmore ES home ultrasound device
Registration Number
NCT05329077
Lead Sponsor
PulseNmore
Brief Summary

This is a multicenter, prospective, investigational device study designed to evaluate:

The safety, feasibility, and accuracy of the device, when used by pregnant individuals

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
188
Inclusion Criteria
  • Singleton gestation.
  • Gestational age >14 weeks with a prior scan demonstrating fetal viability and confirming dates.
  • English or Spanish speaking.
  • Ability to understand and sign the informed consent (available in English and Spanish).
  • Ability to read and understand instructions that are required for equipment use (instructions available in both languages).
Exclusion Criteria
  • Multiple gestations.
  • BMI >40.
  • Known fetal and genetic anomalies.
  • Subjects with skin problems in the abdominal area (such as wounds, cuts in the skin, and skin rash).
  • Subjects allergic to the ultrasound probe materials.
  • Non-English/ non-Spanish speaking.
  • Unable to provide consent.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Home Ultrasound usersPulsenmore ES home ultrasound deviceSingle Arm home ultrasound in pregnant women users
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Comparison of device derived presence or absence of fetal cardiac activity to ground truthTest to be conducted during week 14-38 of pregnancy

The presence or absence of device derived fetal cardiac activity would be matched with the presence or absence of fetal cardiac activity derived by the ground truth (in-clinic ultrasound scan)

Comparison of device derived amniotic fluid level status, normal or abnormal, to ground truthTest to be conducted during week 14-38 of pregnancy

Comparison of device derived amniotic fluid level status, normal or abnormal, (measured by maximal vertical pocket in cm) would be matched with amniotic fluid level status derived from the ground truth (in-clinic ultrasound scan)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Ability to detect fetal movement from device derived input will be compared to the ground truthTest to be conducted during week 14-38 of pregnancy

Whether fetal movement could be detected or could not be detected from device derived input compared to the input from ground truth (in-clinic ultrasound scan)

Ability to assess placental location from device derived input will be compared to the ground truthTest to be conducted during week 14-38 of pregnancy

Whether placental location could be assessed or could not be assessed from device derived input compared to the input from ground truth (in-clinic ultrasound scan)

Ability to detect fetal breathing from device derived input will be compared to the ground truthTest to be conducted during week >27-38 of pregnancy

Whether fetal breathing could be detected or could not be detected from device derived input compared to the input from ground truth (in-clinic ultrasound scan)

Ability to assess fetal presentation from device derived input will be compared to the ground truthTest to be conducted during week 14-38 of pregnancy

Whether fetal presentation could be assessed or could not be assessed from device derived input compared to the input from ground truth (in-clinic ultrasound scan)

Trial Locations

Locations (4)

Brigham and Women's Hospital

🇺🇸

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Center for Fetal Medicine and Women's Ultrasound

🇺🇸

Los Angeles, California, United States

Mount Sinai Hospital System

🇺🇸

New York, New York, United States

University of Florida College of Medicine

🇺🇸

Gainesville, Florida, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath