Pulsenmore ES Device, Efficacy and Safety Assessment
- Conditions
- Perinatal Care
- Interventions
- Device: Pulsenmore ES home ultrasound device
- Registration Number
- NCT05329077
- Lead Sponsor
- PulseNmore
- Brief Summary
This is a multicenter, prospective, investigational device study designed to evaluate:
The safety, feasibility, and accuracy of the device, when used by pregnant individuals
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 188
- Singleton gestation.
- Gestational age >14 weeks with a prior scan demonstrating fetal viability and confirming dates.
- English or Spanish speaking.
- Ability to understand and sign the informed consent (available in English and Spanish).
- Ability to read and understand instructions that are required for equipment use (instructions available in both languages).
- Multiple gestations.
- BMI >40.
- Known fetal and genetic anomalies.
- Subjects with skin problems in the abdominal area (such as wounds, cuts in the skin, and skin rash).
- Subjects allergic to the ultrasound probe materials.
- Non-English/ non-Spanish speaking.
- Unable to provide consent.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Home Ultrasound users Pulsenmore ES home ultrasound device Single Arm home ultrasound in pregnant women users
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparison of device derived presence or absence of fetal cardiac activity to ground truth Test to be conducted during week 14-38 of pregnancy The presence or absence of device derived fetal cardiac activity would be matched with the presence or absence of fetal cardiac activity derived by the ground truth (in-clinic ultrasound scan)
Comparison of device derived amniotic fluid level status, normal or abnormal, to ground truth Test to be conducted during week 14-38 of pregnancy Comparison of device derived amniotic fluid level status, normal or abnormal, (measured by maximal vertical pocket in cm) would be matched with amniotic fluid level status derived from the ground truth (in-clinic ultrasound scan)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Ability to detect fetal movement from device derived input will be compared to the ground truth Test to be conducted during week 14-38 of pregnancy Whether fetal movement could be detected or could not be detected from device derived input compared to the input from ground truth (in-clinic ultrasound scan)
Ability to assess placental location from device derived input will be compared to the ground truth Test to be conducted during week 14-38 of pregnancy Whether placental location could be assessed or could not be assessed from device derived input compared to the input from ground truth (in-clinic ultrasound scan)
Ability to detect fetal breathing from device derived input will be compared to the ground truth Test to be conducted during week >27-38 of pregnancy Whether fetal breathing could be detected or could not be detected from device derived input compared to the input from ground truth (in-clinic ultrasound scan)
Ability to assess fetal presentation from device derived input will be compared to the ground truth Test to be conducted during week 14-38 of pregnancy Whether fetal presentation could be assessed or could not be assessed from device derived input compared to the input from ground truth (in-clinic ultrasound scan)
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (4)
Brigham and Women's Hospital
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Center for Fetal Medicine and Women's Ultrasound
🇺🇸Los Angeles, California, United States
Mount Sinai Hospital System
🇺🇸New York, New York, United States
University of Florida College of Medicine
🇺🇸Gainesville, Florida, United States