Text 2 Connect- Texting Intervention for Mental Health Treatment Utilization

Not Applicable

Completed

Conditions: Depression
Suicidal Ideation

Interventions: Behavioral: Text2Connect
Behavioral: Psychoeducational Videos (PE) Only

Registration Number: NCT04560075

Lead Sponsor: University of Pittsburgh

Brief Summary: Text2Connect (T2C) proposes to test a text-based intervention designed to improve engagement with mental health treatment.

Detailed Description: To enhance outcomes for transition-age youth with mental health disorders during the vulnerable period that occurs during their first several months of college, the investigators propose an automated TM intervention, "Text to Connect" (T2C), that aims to increase mental health self-efficacy through psychoeducation, self-monitoring of symptoms and stressors, and cues to action for college-bound youth.

Assignment of Interventions:

The study will utilize block randomization whereby 2/3 of participants will be randomly assigned to receive T2C, and 1/3 to receive PE. Blocks will balance the groups on site (CCP versus STAR/CABS). A 2:1 randomization scheme will randomize 50 youth to either receive T2C (n=30) or a link to brief psychoeducational videos about mental health (PE; n=20). All participants will then complete a brief battery of self-report assessments online at baseline and again monthly through month 4. Youth randomized to receive PE will receive a text message with the link to the webpage with the psychoeducational videos. Youth randomized to receive T2C will be onboarded and initiate the TM intervention that sends automated prompts at minimum monthly through month 4.

Hypothesis:

Aim 1. To examine the feasibility of T2C for transition-age youth with psychiatric disorders (n=3 clinics, 50 adolescents). Youth randomized to receive T2C will:

Hypothesis 1a. engage with T2C at high rates (\>70% response rate to SMS prompts).

Hypothesis 1b. report high levels of satisfaction (\>70% satisfaction) and usability with T2C.

Aim 2. To examine the impact of T2C versus PE on mental health self-efficacy, symptoms and functioning, and treatment engagement. Over 4 months, youth who receive T2C, as compared with youth who receive PE, will report:

Hypothesis 2a (Primary). Greater mental health self-efficacy Hypothesis 2b (Secondary). Lower symptom severity and greater psychosocial functioning Hypothesis 2c (Secondary). Higher rates of follow-through with mental health services

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 52

Inclusion Criteria

Participant engaged in treatment at CC Waterdam, STAR or CABS clinic
Participants have a current psychiatric diagnosis documented in their electronic medical record and/or be in receipt of mental health services within 3 months per self-/ parent- or clinician- report
At least 18 years of age
Recently graduated high school
Planning to attend college or higher education program within 6 weeks
Own a text-capable phone
Be willing and able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

Participants will be excluded if they have conditions that might impair their ability to effectively engage in Text2Connect
Under the age of 18yo
Non-English speakers

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Text2Connect	Text2Connect	Participants receiving Text2Connect (T2C) personalized messages will receive a monthly check-in text prompt. Based on their response, the participants then receive either general psychoeducational videos and prompts to continue to monitor mental health or are then prompted to endorse stressors and symptoms they are experiencing to prompt awareness of treatment targets in daily life.
Psychoeducational Videos (PE) Only	Psychoeducational Videos (PE) Only	Participants will receive a web link to a library of 4 PE videos. These brief 2-minute videos include general information about self-care during college.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Engagement With Intervention: Drop Out Rate	Over 3 months after baseline	Participant's engagement with the T2C intervention will be assessed via their response rate to prompts, as the primary outcome of Text2Connect Phase 2. "High" engagement with T2C will be rated as \>70% response rate. Participants are considered "dropped out" if they requested to be removed from the T2C intervention and all texts to be stopped.
Usability & Satisfaction-CSQ	3 month follow up timepoint	Satisfaction with the technical components of interventions will be assessed through the certain questions from the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ8). 8 items are scored on a likert scale of 1 to 4. Item 1 (reverse scored): scale 1(excellent)-4 (poor); Item 2: 1(definitely not)-4(definitely); item 3(reverse scored): 1(none of needs met)-4(all needs met); item 4: 1(definitely not)-4(definitely); item 5: 1(quite dissatisfied)-4(very satisfied); item 6(reverse scored): 1(made things worse)-4(helped a great deal); item 7 (reverse scored): 1(quite dissatisfied)-4(very satisfied); item 8: 1(definitely not)-4(definitely). Higher scores=higher satisfaction (score sum range is 8-32).
General Self-Efficacy	3 month Timepoint	Mental health self-efficacy will be assessed via the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE), as the primary outcome of Text2Connect Phase 2. The GSE contains 10 items scored on a 4-point Likert Scale, with scores ranging from 10-40. Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.
Engagement With Intervention: Web-based Check Ins	Over 3 months after baseline	Participant's engagement with the T2C intervention will be assessed via their response rate to prompts, as the primary outcome of Text2Connect Phase 2. "High" engagement with T2C will be rated as \>70% response rate. Participants received 1 text "How would you rate our emotional health this last week" on a likert scale of: 1 (excellent), 2 Very good, 3 good 4 fair 5 poor. If respondents answered "fair" or "Poor" they were routed to a website with psychoeducational videos and additional questions called a "web-based check in." The questions inquired what type of stressors the participant experienced contributing to the "Fair" or "Poor" ratings, what types of symptoms the participants noticed as a result of the indicated stressor and if participants felt they could manage their stress.
Mental Health Self-Efficacy	2 month timepoint	Mental health self-efficacy will be assessed via the Mental Health Self-Efficacy Scale (MHSES), as the primary outcome of Text2Connect Phase 2. The MHSES contains 6 items that are scored on a 10-point Likert Scale. Scores range from 6-60 with higher scores indicating greater confidence in participant's mental health self-efficacy.
Engagement With Intervention: Text Message Check-ins	Over 3 months after baseline	Participant's engagement with the T2C intervention will be assessed via their response rate to SMS prompts, as the primary outcome of Text2Connect Phase 2. "High" engagement with T2C will be rated as \>70% response rate. All Intervention participants (n=34) received text-message check-ins with question: "How would you rate your emotional health this past week?" on a likert scale of: 1=excellent; 2=very good; 3=good;4=fair; 5=poor. Participants who did not respond to this message initially were sent a reminder with the same content each week of the intervention.
Usability & Satisfaction-PSSUQ	3 month follow up timepoint	Satisfaction with the technical components of interventions will be assessed through the certain questions from the Post System Satisfaction and Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ), as the primary outcome of Text2Connect Phase 2. The PSSUQ utilize 16 items w/ response options ranging from 1-7 where 1=strongly disagree and 7=strongly agree. The PSSUQ has sub-scores derived from subsets of the questions which reflect system usefulness, information quality, and interface quality. Scores are added and range from 16-112, with higher score indicating less satisfaction. Questions 1 to 16 result in the Overall score; Questions 1 to 6 result in System Usefulness score; Questions 7 to 12 result in Information Quality score; Questions 13 to 16 result in Interface Quality.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Mental Health Service Follow-through	3 month timepoint	Mental health service follow-through will be assessed via the Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI). Ratings of 4 questions are Yes or No indicating if participants received the type of service. Scores described below are count of participants indicating "Yes" on the scale.
Symptom Severity	3 month timepoint	Symptom severity will be assessed via the CCAPS Mental Health Symptoms. The CCAPS is a 62-item instrument with 8 subscales (depression, general anxiety, social anxiety, academic distress, eating concerns, family distress, hostility, substance abuse) related to psychological symptoms \& distress in college students. Scores are on a 5 point likert scale for each subscale: 0 (not at all like me), 1,2,3,4 (Extremely like me). Lower scores indicate greater severity of symptoms. Some items are reverse-scored. To score, average the items scores for each subscale to create the subscale raw score.
Psychosocial Functioning	3 month timepoint	Psychosocial functioning will be assessed via the College Adjustment Questionnaire (CAQ) The CAQ contains 14 questions \& 3 subscales (Educational, Relational, \& Psychological functioning) embedded within. Each subscale is scored on 1(very inaccurate)-5 (very accurate) likert scale. Educational Functioning items include: 1, 5, 7, 12, 13; Relational Functioning items include: 2, 4, 9, 10, 14; Psychological Functioning items include: 3, 6, 8, 11. Items 2 \& 9 from Relational subscale, 13 from Educational subscale, \& 8 \& 11 from Psychological subscale are reversed scored on 5 (very inaccurate)-1(very accurate) likert scale. The Educational functioning subscale score can be summed range from 5-25; the Relational functioning subscale score can be summed range from 5-25; the Psychological subscale can be summed range from 4-20. Total scores across all 3 subscales can be summed \& range from 14-70. Higher scores indicate better functioning on each scale and across the total measure.

Trial Locations

Locations (3): Children's Community Pediatrics (CCP- Waterdam) of Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh UPMC
🇺🇸
McMurray, Pennsylvania, United States
STAR Center
🇺🇸
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Child and Adolescent Bipolar Spectrum Services (CABS) Center
🇺🇸
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States