NCT02998632UnknownNot Applicable
The Effect of Posterior Mandibular Ridge Augmentation Using Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix Versus Autogenous Bone Graft on Implant Body Stability: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparative Study
Conditions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Enrollment
- 20
- Primary Endpoint
- Implant body stability in ISQ unit
Study Overview
Brief Summary
- Patients will be diagnosed to determine whether they are eligible for the inclusion criteria of this study or not. Patients who are eligible will start their surgical treatment in the next visit after radiographic and surgical site evaluation.
- On the day of surgery, each patient will be assigned to either intervention or control group, the patients will receive inferior alveolar nerve block and long buccal nerve anesthesia. Future implant site will be planned, an incision will be made and flap will be reflected along the defective ridge.
- Implant fixture/s will be inserted in the previously planned site. Uncovered fixture threads and bone defect will be covered by MPM or autogenous bone graft.
- In the control group, autogenous particulate bone graft will be used for vertical augmentation and covered with titanium reinforced membrane. In the intervention group, MPM (Mineralized plasmatic matrix) will be used.
- Edges will be approximated, Sutures will be placed.
- Osstell instrument will be used to measure and record fixture primary stability in ISQ units.
- Patients will be referred to the fixed prosthodontics department for placement of the crowns after ensuring success of osseointegration and implant stability (after 4 months).
- Patients will evaluate their overall satisfaction after fitting the final prosthesis using a questionnaire at 9 months.
- After 9 months, CBCT will be performed to evaluate augmented bone height to be compared with the bone height previously recorded in CBCT.
- Osstell instrument will be used to evaluate the implant stability ratio in ISQ unit to be compared to the ratio recorded before.
Detailed Description
In the study group:
- Full medical and dental history will be obtained from all the patients participating in this study (figure 2).
- Thorough clinical and radiographic examination for the ridge area to be treated will be done.
- Future implant site will be planned.
- Each patient will be asked to evaluate their overall satisfaction using a questionnaire before any intervention.
- Patients will receive 2 gm of amoxicillin 1 hour before surgery. They will be instructed to wash their mouths with a 0.12% chlorhexidine solution for 30 seconds immediately before surgery.
- The patient will receive inferior alveolar nerve block and long buccal nerve anesthesia using articane HCl 4% with 1:100,000 adrenaline local anesthetic solution using aspirating syringe and 27-gauge needle.
- After confirming the success of profound local anaesthesia, an incision will be made and flap will be reflected along the ridge of the previously planned intraoral donor site to completely expose bone.
- Autogenous bone graft will be obtained and will be grinded according to the dimensions of the present defect.
- MPM (Mineralized plasmatic matrix) will be prepared:
Tubes of 9 ml of venous blood will be taken from the patient and will be placed in a centrifuge at 2500 rpm / min for 5 min.
At the end of the centrifugation, the blood in the tube will be separated into two compartments one yellow and one red.
The yellow part will be withdrawn with a syringe to be mixed with the grinded autogenous bone previously obtained from intra oral site.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to 50 Years (Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •Medically free patients.
- •Patients with posterior mandibular defective partially edentulous ridge.
- •Evaluated bone height on CBCT to be (0-4 mm buccal bone dehiscence) and width (not less than 4.5 mm)
- •Patients physically able to tolerate surgical and restorative procedures.
- •Patients with an opposing tooth to the pre-implant site.
- •Good oral hygiene.
- •Highly motivated patients.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients allergic to local anaesthetic agent.
- •Pregnant or lactating females.
- •Presence of any pathosis in the pre-implant site.
- •Presence of parafunctional habits.
- •History of oral radiotherapy.
- •History of prolonged steroids use.
- •Psychological disorders.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Implant body stability in ISQ unit
Time Frame: Change from baseline implant body stability at 4 months
Secondary Outcomes
- Bone height in Cone beam CT(Change from baseline bone height at 9 months)
Investigators
Ahmed Abdel-Sattar
Principal Investigator
Cairo University
Similar Trials
Unknown
Not Applicable
Assessment of Vertical Ridge Augmentation for Posterior Mandible by Computer Guided Onlay vs Free Hand Onlay GraftVertical Deficeny of Posterior MandibleNCT05512078Cairo University8
Completed
Phase 4
PROMAD: Predicting Therapeutic Outcome of Mandibular Advancement Device Treatment in Obstructive Sleep ApneaObstructive Sleep Apnea SyndromeNCT01532050ethisch.comite@uza.be100
Completed
Not Applicable
Bibloc Mandibular Advancement Oral Device and Its Effect on TMJ HealthObstructive Sleep Apnea of AdultNCT06492096Mansoura University66
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Mandibular Advancement Planning Based on Clinical OverjetOverjetClass II Division 1 MalocclusionNCT06653075IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele50
Completed
Not Applicable
Evaluation of a Mandibular Advancement Device in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea SyndromeObstructive Sleep ApneaNCT00213434University Hospital, Rouen
