跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03163108
NCT03163108已完成不适用

Closed-loop Automatic Oxygen Control (CLAC-4) in Preterm Infants: a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Revised Algorithm

University Hospital Tuebingen2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 19 人开始时间: 2017年3月15日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
19
试验地点
2
主要终点
Proportion of time with SpO2 within target range

研究概览

简要总结

Two-center, randomised controlled, cross-over clinical trial in preterm infants born at gestational age below 34+1/7 weeks receiving supplemental oxygen and respiratory support (Continous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or Non-invasive Ventilation (NIV) or Invasive Ventilation (IV)). Routine manual control (RMC) of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) will be tested against RMC supported by closed-loop automatic control (CLAC) with "slow"-algorithm and RMC supported by CLAC with "fast"-algorithm.

The primary hypothesis is, that the use of the "faster" algorithm results in more time within arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) target range compared to RMC only. The a-priori subordinate hypothesis is, that the faster algorithm is equally effective as the slower algorithm to maintain the SpO2 in the target range.

详细描述

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE In preterm infants receiving supplemental oxygen, routine manual control (RMC) of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) is often difficult and time consuming. The investigators developed a system for closed-loop automatic control (CLAC) of the FiO2 and demonstrated its safety and efficacy in a multi-center study. The objective of this study is to test a revised, "faster" algorithm with a shorter WAIT-interval of 30sec (= time between FiO2 changes) against the previously tested algorithm (WAIT of 180sec) and against RMC. The primary hypothesis is, that the application of CLAC with the "faster" algorithm in addition to RMC results in more time within arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) target range compared to RMC only. The a-priori subordinate hypothesis is, that the faster algorithm is equally effective as the slower algorithm to maintain the SpO2 in the target range.

Further hypotheses for exploratory testing are, that the "fast" algorithm will achieve a higher proportion of time with SpO2 within target range and an improved stability of cerebral oxygenation (measured as rcStO2 and rcFtO2E determined by Near-infrared spectroscopy) compared with the slow algorithm.

STUDY DESIGN The Study is designed as a two-center, randomized controlled, cross-over clinical trial in preterm infants receiving mechanical ventilation or nasal continuous positive airway pressure or non-invasive ventilation and supplemental oxygen (FiO2 above 0.21). Within a twenty-four-hour period the investigators will compare 8 hours of RMC with 8-hour periods of RMC supported by CLAC "slow" algorithm or "fast" algorithm, respectively.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • gestational age at birth <34+1/7weeks
  • invasive mechanical ventilation OR noninvasive ventilation OR continous positive airway pressure support
  • Fraction of inspired oxygen above 0.21 before inclusion
  • more than 2 hypoxaemic events (arterial oxygen saturation below 80%) within 8 hours before inclusion
  • parental written informed consent

排除标准

  • congenital pulmonary anomalies
  • diaphragmatic hernia or other diaphragmatic disorders

研究组 & 干预措施

RMC only

No Intervention

routine manual control (RMC) of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2)

CLAC fast

Experimental

routine manual control (RMC) + Closed-loop automatic oxygen control (CLAC) with 30sec WAIT-Interval ("fast" algorithm) of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2)

干预措施: Closed-loop automatic oxygen control (CLAC) fast in addition to RMC (Device)

CLAC slow

Active Comparator

routine manual control (RMC) + Closed-loop automatic oxygen control (CLAC) with 180sec WAIT-Interval ("slow" algorithm) of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2)

干预措施: Closed-loop automatic oxygen control (CLAC) slow in addition to RMC (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Proportion of time with SpO2 within target range

时间窗: 16 hours

Comparison of proportion of time with SpO2 within target range if the infant requires supplemental oxygen and time above target range if the infant requires no supplemental oxygen between CLAC-fast and RMC (superiority hypothesis).

Proportion of Time with SpO2 within target range

时间窗: 16 hours

Comparison of proportion of time with SpO2 within target range if the infant requires supplemental oxygen and time above target range if the infant requires no supplemental oxygen between CLAC-fast and CLAC-slow (subordinate, non inferiority hypothesis).

次要结局

  • Duration of hyperoxaemia(16 hours)
  • Duration of hypoxaemia(16 hours)
  • Stability of cerebral oxygenation(24 hours)
  • Duration of "overshoot" hyperoxaemia(16 hours)
  • Number of "overshoot" hyperoxaemia(16 hours)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验