IRCT20160523028008N24招募中2 期
Comparison of the outcome of uterine incision suture with the magon - babo technique (new technique) with the conventional method.
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 2 期
- 状态
- 招募中
- 入组人数
- 240
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 years 至 45 years（—）
- 性别
- Female
入选标准
- •Single pregnancy
- •Age between 18 and 45 years
- •Gestational age between 24 and 41 weeks
- •history of previous cesarean section
排除标准
- •Multiple pregnancies
- •Chronic inflammatory diseases such as lupus, rheumatoid arthritis
研究者
相似试验
招募中
不适用
Evaluation of two vaginal, uterussparing surgical methods for pelvic organ prolapse reconstruction: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinal hysteropexy (SSH).pelvic organ prolaps, POP, POP-Q, uterine prolaps, verzakking, baarmoederverzakking, uterusprolapsNL-OMON26794Radboudumc Nijmegen424
招募中
不适用
Evaluation of two vaginal, uterussparing surgical methods for pelvic organ prolapse reconstruction: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinal hysteropexy (SSH).pelvic organ prolapsevaginal descent1004778910029903NL-OMON54613Academisch Medisch Centrum424
Unknown
不适用
NIche Development With Closure of Cesarean Uterotomy by Modified or Conventional Two-layer TechniqueCesarean Scar NicheNCT02410395University of Aarhus230
已完成
不适用
A New Technique for Uterine Incision Closure at The Time of Cesarean Section: Does it Make a DifferenceCesarean SectionWound DehiscenceNCT04681378Menoufia University120
已完成
3 期
Endometrial incision in the fundus of uterine and the success rate of assisted reproductive techniqueFemale infertility.Female infertilityIRCT20091012002576N21Tehran University of Medical Sciences500