MedPath

Interest of Prior Relaxation on the Recordings of the SomatoSensory Evoked Potentials

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Patient Experience
Relaxation
Somatosensory Evoked Potentials
Interventions
Other: SSEP
Other: relaxation session
Registration Number
NCT05546307
Lead Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens
Brief Summary

Many factors influence the quality and duration of SomatoSensory Evoked potentials (SSEP). Some are related to the technique : type of electrodes, intensity of stimulation, stimulation site ; others are related to the patient : poor state of relaxation of the patient generating muscle artefacts; hypersensitivity of the patient to electrical stimuli making the examination unpleasant; examination time considered too long. However, the patient's relaxed state is essential to the quality of the signal . Thus the duration of an examination is very variable : between 30 and 75 minutes for the upper limbs.... For several months, the investigators provide relaxation to some patients just before the examination. Results seem to be positive. The investigators aim to study the effect of relaxation session on the quality of the SSEP recordings. Fifteen-minutes relaxation session will be provided by a nurse trained to the relaxation.

The investigators will compare two groups : one group with one relaxation session before the examination and one group without relaxation session before the examination.

The investigators chose to study the influence of relaxation session on (i) the artifacts rejection rate by the machine for the recordings of SSEP by stimulation of the median nerve to the upper limbs (ii) the duration of the examination (iii) the patient experience

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
242
Inclusion Criteria
  • Any patient addressed for a study of the somatosensory evoked potentials in upper limbs
  • Patients between 18 to 70 years old.
  • Patients able to understand the instructions of the relaxation session and the examination.
  • Patient providing informed consent exclusion criteria
Exclusion Criteria
  • No availability of a technician trained in relaxation
  • Patient's refusal to participate in the protocol

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
one relaxation session before the examinationSSEP-
one relaxation session before the examinationrelaxation session-
No relaxation session before the examinationSSEP-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Variation of average rate of automatized artifacts rejection between both groups19 months

Average rate of automatized artifacts rejection during 2 sessions of 1000 stimulations on the first stimulated limb to obtain the N13 wave

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Amiens University Hospital

🇫🇷

Amiens, Picardie, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath