A study of Knee arthroplasty results in young, active patients to compare three different tibial implant designs.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- advanced arthritis of knee necessitating total knee replacement
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2012/01/002318
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Rajesh Maniar
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Open to Recruitment
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 256
Inclusion Criteria
inclusion criteria:
1. age < 60 years at total knee arthroplasty
2. atleast 5 years post surgery
Exclusion Criteria
- All patients above 60 years of age
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method -clinical derived score: american knee society score (knee score & functional score) <br/ ><br>-Radiologic assessment using the radiological knee society score: component placement-femroal & tibial, presence of osteolysis if yes, which regions, patella position, bone surface coverage area by tibial component, hip/ankle/knee axis for alignment <br/ ><br>Timepoint: follow up date in next 1 year(5-9 yrs) <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Range of motion, anterior knee pain, anterior knee crepitusTimepoint: 5-9 years