Cycling Versus Continuous Mode in Neuromodulator Programming
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 32
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Short Form (OABq) Short Form Symptom Bother Scale Result
研究概览
简要总结
The investigators objective is to compare patient outcomes as changes in validated symptom measures of overactive bladder, the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form (OABq-SF) symptom scale, between women who are set on cycling versus continuous programs for their neuromodulator. Specifically, the investigators propose to perform a randomized double blind crossover study in women who are successfully treated with neuromodulation to either continuous or cycling mode on the modulator and compare differences between groups on the validated OABq-SF symptom questionnaire. In addition, the investigators will compare differences in urinary frequency and pad counts between women randomized to cycling versus continuous stimulation as measured by a 3 day voiding diary. This investigation will provide evidence-based guidelines for neuromodulator programming.
详细描述
Background and Significance:
The purpose of this research proposal is to evaluate the effect of cycling versus continuous neuromodulator programming on overactive bladder syndrome. s.In 1997, the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) approved the sacral nerve stimulator as a treatment for refractory urge incontinence. Sacral Neuromodulation works via stimulation of the sacral nerve roots 2-4, (S-2, S-3 and S-4), although the exact mechanism of action is unknown. While implanted electronic stimulators have been used increasingly in the last twenty years, little investigation has documented the actual programming of the stimulator. Prospective trials examining the ideal programming parameters for a specific condition are needed to better identify optimal use of sacral nerve modulation therapy.
In brief, women with overactive bladder who are refractory to treatment are eligible for a trial placement of a neuromodulator. The modulators are placed in two stages; in stage one, a temporary lead is placed in the 3rd sacral foramen. Each neuromodulator has 4 electrodes that are placed via a single lead into the 3rd sacral foramen. The patient will generally return to clinic one week following stage 1 for a post-op evaluation. If the patient reports a 50% improvement in frequency as measured on a 3-day voiding diary, the modulator is permanently implanted. This is stage 2. After placement, the modulator is programmed in the recovery room. Patients are trialed on four set programs for their stimulator. Each program differs in electrode combination, pulse width, amplitude and rate as well as direction of current. Each of the four programs is tested with the patient to determine which is felt by the patient in the perineum and is comfortable. Finally, patients can either have their modulator set on a cycling or continuous mode. Currently, decisions regarding programming are made by whoever is assessing the patient and are not data driven.
Typically, cycling means the neuromodulator stimulation is on for 16 seconds & off for 8 seconds. Continuous means the patient receives constant stimulation. A single retrospective study described program parameters for programming of the modulator for treatment of Over Active Bladder (OAB). It described 67 patients who had good response to neuromodulation, and determined the mean pulse width was 204 microseconds, the pulse width ranged between 120-270 microseconds; the average rate was 9 with a range of 2-20 pulses/second. The majority of women were on cycling mode. Program cycling is purported to decrease the incidence of patients reporting that their modulator is no longer working and thought to extend battery life. No other study has investigated whether or not cycling of the stimulator improves patient outcomes.
Our objective is to compare patient outcomes using in validated symptom measures of OAB between women who are set on cycling versus continuous programs. Investigators propose to perform a randomized crossover study in women who are successfully treated with neuromodulation to either continuous or cycling mode and compare differences between groups on the OAB-q SF symptom questionnaire. The investigators will also compare differences in urinary frequency and pad counts between women randomized to cycling versus continuous stimulation using voiding diaries.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Crossover
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 21 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Women at least 21 years old or older eligible for implantation of a neuromodulator
- •Women with successful Stage #1 implantation for treatment of refractory OAB
- •Subjects may be enrolled in other studies as long as there are no changes to the neuromodulation device. Women may continue other OAB therapies that they are on, but as asked to not start new therapies.
- •Not currently pregnant and with no plans to become pregnant during the course of the trial.
- •Willing as well as mentally and physically capable of completing all study related procedures and materials
排除标准
- •Males (we do not care for males in our urogynecology clinic)
- •Incarcerated women
- •Non-English speakers
- •Pregnant women
- •Scheduled or planned MRIs or diathermy
研究组 & 干预措施
Cycling
Sacral neuromodulator devices (implanted pulse generator) will be programmed to on-off cycles (on 16 seconds, off 8 seconds). This means the devices are not continuously on. Rather they are on a "cycling" program.
干预措施: sacral neuromodulator (Device)
Continuous
Sacral neuromodulator devices (implanted pulse generator) will be programmed to be on continuously. This means the devices are continuously on. They are on a "continuous" program.
干预措施: sacral neuromodulator (Device)
结局指标
主要结局
Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Short Form (OABq) Short Form Symptom Bother Scale Result
时间窗: Three months after change in program from cycling to continuous or vice versa.
The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) assesses symptom bother \& health-related quality of life (HRQL) for overactive bladder. The short form OAB-q SF, provides a quick assessment of symptom bother, consisting of a 6-item symptom bother scale. The questionnaire is on a 6 point scale, 1 indicates symptom is not bothersome (best outcome), 6 indicates symptom bothers the participant "a very great deal" (worst possible outcome). The majority of the participants were missing the HRQL portion of the questionnaire, so this portion of the questionnaire was not included in the analysis. These are the raw scores ranges for each question prior to being transformed. The possible scores for complete surveys range from 13 (if the participant marked "not bothersome" for all 6) to 78 (if the participant marked "a very great deal" for all 6 questions) once transformed. The reported numbers are the transformed scores \[(actual raw score-lowest possible score)/possible raw score range\] X 100.
次要结局
- Voiding Diary: Urge Incontinence Episodes(Three months after change in program from cycling to continuous or vice versa.)
- Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Questionnaire Scale Results(Three months after change in program from cycling to continuous or vice versa.)
研究者
Yuko Komesu
MD, Principal Investigator
University of New Mexico
