Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/NL-OMON28686
NL-OMON28686
Recruiting
Not Applicable

Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament versus the posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a long term follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical tria

o funding0 sites75 target enrollmentTBD
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Not specified
Sponsor
o funding
Enrollment
75
Status
Recruiting
Last Updated
2 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
TBD
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Observational non invasive

Investigators

Sponsor
o funding

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients who participated in the previous randomized controlled trial (registration number: 2007\-23; abr number: NL 16071\.056\.07; NTR 1673\)

Exclusion Criteria

  • •\- deceased
  • •\- no known contact address
  • •\- reasons to believe that the patient is not capable – e.g. because of cognitive reasons \- to fill out the questionnaires
  • •\- revision surgery of the index knee (except for revision of the patella)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Completed
Not Applicable
Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament versus the posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trialosteoarthrosis of the knee joint10023213
NL-OMON30597Martini Ziekenhuis120
Completed
Not Applicable
Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament versus the posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a long term follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial
NL-OMON49929Martini Ziekenhuis75
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparing two different designs of total knee arthroplasty in 120 patients: 60 patients receive the prosthesis in which the posterior cruciate ligament is spared and 60 patients receive the prosthesis in which the ligament is sacrificed.
NL-OMON24528Martini Hospital Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, the Netherlands120
Withdrawn
Not Applicable
Preservation of both cruciate ligaments as essential step to the forgotten knee. Do we need the anterior cruciate ligament for better functional outcomes? A randomized controlled gait analysis trialAnterior Cruciate Ligamentmovement analysis10023213
NL-OMON41915Orbis Medisch Centrum68
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Preservation of both cruciate ligaments as essential step to the forgotten knee. Do we need the anterior cruciate ligament for better functional outcomes? A randomized controlled gait analysis trialAnterior Cruciate Ligamentmovement analysis10023213
NL-OMON48002Zuyderland Medisch Centrum64