MedPath

Efficacy and Safety of Gadopiclenol for Central Nervous System (CNS) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
CNS Lesion
Blood Brain Barrier Defect
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT03996447
Lead Sponsor
Guerbet
Brief Summary

This trial aimed to evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of gadopiclenol for Central Nervous System (CNS) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Detailed Description

The purpose of this trial was to evaluate a new gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) gadopiclenol injection for Central Nervous System (CNS) lesion detection and visualization by conventional steady-state CNS imaging.

This is a multi-center, international, prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled, cross-over with comparator trial in male and female patients presenting with known or highly suspected CNS lesion(s) with focal areas of disrupted Blood Brain Barrier (BBB) (e.g., primary and secondary tumors) who are scheduled to undergo a routine contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the CNS.

This trial was conducted in 33 centers worldwide.

During the course of the trial, two MRIs were obtained from each patient: one unenhanced and gadopiclenol-enhanced MRI; and one unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRI. MRI evaluations were performed by on-site investigators and three independent off-site blinded readers.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
260
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patient presenting with known or highly suspected CNS lesion(s) with focal areas of disrupted Blood Brain Barrier (BBB) (e.g., primary and secondary tumors) based on results of a previous imaging procedure such as Computed Tomography (CT) or MRI, which should have been performed within 12 months prior to ICF signature.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patient presenting with acute or chronic renal insufficiency, defined as an estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m² assessed within 1 day prior to each contrast agent injection
  • Patient presenting extra cranial lesions and/or extra-dural lesions.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
gadopiclenol-enhanced MRI then gadobutrol-enhanced MRIgadopiclenolcross-over design. each patient will receive gadopiclenol for the first MRI and gadobutrol for the second MRI
gadopiclenol-enhanced MRI then gadobutrol-enhanced MRIGadobutrol 1Mmol/mL Solution for Injection Vialcross-over design. each patient will receive gadopiclenol for the first MRI and gadobutrol for the second MRI
gadobutrol-enhanced MRI then gadopiclenol-enhanced MRIGadobutrol 1Mmol/mL Solution for Injection Vialcross-over design. each patient will receive gadobutrol for the first MRI and gadopiclenol for the second MRI
gadobutrol-enhanced MRI then gadopiclenol-enhanced MRIgadopiclenolcross-over design. each patient will receive gadobutrol for the first MRI and gadopiclenol for the second MRI
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Lesion Visualization Comparing Gadopiclenol-enhanced MRI to Unenhanced MRIAt first MRI examination (gadopiclenol-enhanced MRI) for patients of Arm 1. At second MRI examination (gadopiclenol-enhanced MRI) for patients of Arm 2, performed 2-14 days after gadobutrol-enhanced MRI.

The lesion visualization (per patient) was based on 3 co-primary criteria on marching lesions: border delineation, internal morphology and degree of contrast enhancement, assessed on the images acquired during the MRI performed with gadopiclenol by 3 independent readers. The independent blinded reader recorded each of the 3 co-primary criteria for up to 3 most representative lesions, using a 4-point scale (1 = poor \[internal morphology\] or none \[border delineation, contrast enhancement\], 2 = moderate, 3 = good, 4 = excellent). The mean of scores for each patient and for each co-criterion was calculated as follows: Mean of scores = score of lesion 1 + score of lesion 2 (if any) + score of lesion 3 (if any) divided by the number of lesions, ranged from 1 to 4. The difference in mean scores on matching lesions between Paired \[unenhanced and contrast-enhanced\] images and Pre-contrast \[unenhanced\] images was calculated for each of the 3 co-primary criteria and for each reader.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Lesion Visualization Comparing Gadopiclenol-enhanced MRI to Gadobutrol-enhanced MRIAt each of two MRI examinations with an interval of 2-14 days between 2 MRI examinations

The lesion visualization (per patient) was based on 3 co-primary criteria: border delineation, internal morphology and degree of contrast enhancement, assessed on the images performed with gadopiclenol and images performed with gadobutrol by 3 independent readers. The independent blinded reader recorded each of the 3 co-primary criteria for up to 3 most representative lesions, using a 4-point scale (1 = poor \[internal morphology\] or none \[border delineation, contrast enhancement\], 2 = moderate, 3 = good, 4 = excellent). The mean of scores for each patient and for each of the 3 lesion visualization co-criteria was calculated as follows: Mean of scores = score of lesion 1 + score of lesion 2 (if any) + score of lesion 3 (if any) divided by the number of lesions, ranged from 1 to 4. The difference in mean scores on matching lesions between gadopiclenol scores mean and gadobutrol scores mean was calculated for each of the 3 co-primary criteria and for each reader.

Trial Locations

Locations (33)

ASCLEPES Research Centers

🇺🇸

Panorama City, California, United States

University of Connecticut Health Center

🇺🇸

Farmington, Connecticut, United States

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

🇺🇸

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Northwest Neurology, Ltd.

🇺🇸

Rolling Meadows, Illinois, United States

University of Missouri Hospital and Clinic

🇺🇸

Columbia, Missouri, United States

University Of Pennsylvania

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research (SCTR) Institute

🇺🇸

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

University Of Washington - Medical Center

🇺🇸

Seattle, Washington, United States

ZNA Middelheim

🇧🇪

Antwerp, Belgium

UZ Brussel - Campus Jette

🇧🇪

Brussels, Belgium

Scroll for more (23 remaining)
ASCLEPES Research Centers
🇺🇸Panorama City, California, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.