跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04965324
NCT04965324已完成不适用

Depth of Anaesthesia and Long-term Survival in Elderly Surgical Patients: The Balanced Anaesthesia Study Long-term Follow-up Study

Auckland City Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 6,644 人开始时间: 2012年12月19日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
6,644
试验地点
1
主要终点
Survival

研究概览

简要总结

Anaesthetic depth and complications after major surgery: an international, randomised controlled trial - The BALANCED trial.

In this large, international, randomised controlled trial that enrolled patients aged 60 years and over with significant comorbidity and at increased risk of complications after major surgery, we found no evidence that light general anaesthesia (bispectral index 50) was superior to deep general anaesthesia (bispectral index 35) in reducing 1-year mortality. The BALANCED long term follow up study will look at whether depth of anesthesia affects long term (beyond 1 year) survival.

The primary hypothesis is that targetting BIS 50 will result in superior long term survival compared to targetting BIS 35.

The two secondary hypotheses are that BIS titration to BIS 50 will

  1. reduce local cancer recurrence or metastatic spread and consequently improve long-term survival
  2. reduce postoperative delirium and associated cognitive impairment and consequently improve long-term survival

Both these mechanisms would be expected to take longer to manifest as reduced survival than 1-year all-cause mortality primary outcome in the Balanced trial. Trials of cancer outcomes often use 5-year survival or similar timeframes to determine evidence of clinical benefit. A steeper cognitive trajectory due to intermediate outcomes such as delirium and cognitive impairment may take longer than 1 year to produce a clinically important difference in survival 30. The 10.6% relative risk reduction seen in the Balanced trial could translate to a statistically and clinically meaningful survival difference in this high-risk population. This population may have 5-year survival of ~80% translating to an absolute survival difference of ~2% potentially (if the ~10% RRR is maintained beyond 1 year). The alternative is that there is no long-term mortality difference which would provide continuing clinical guidance of the safety of current practice in patients who are not at high risk of delirium. This study could provide a rationale for trials in larger populations (such as the total Balanced trial population) or targeted subgroups such as cancer and delirium to provide further mechanistic insights.

Long-term survival is an important patient-centred outcome. The mechanisms described above may manifest in longer-term outcomes providing a clear rationale for the current trial.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
60 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Survival

时间窗: Between one year and eight years after randomization to the BALANCED Trial

Survival

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other Gov
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验