Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06132646
NCT06132646
Not Yet Recruiting
N/A

Effectiveness of a Global Proprioceptive Training After Wrist Fracture

University of Malaga0 sites28 target enrollmentJanuary 7, 2024

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Wrist Fractures
Sponsor
University of Malaga
Enrollment
28
Primary Endpoint
Change in function related with daily living activities
Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Last Updated
2 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare how a program of proprioceptive exercises for the wrist could influence in pain, functionality and quality of life in people that have suffered a wrist fracture. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Evaluate the effect of a specific proprioceptive program on pain and functionality.
  • Study the relationship between proprioception deficit and functionality.

Intervention will be:

  • Control group: participants of this group are going to receive only standard rehabilitation program after wrist fracture.
  • Experimental group: participants of this group are going to receive standard rehabilitation program after distal radius fracture and a specific proprioceptive program.

Researchers will compare control and experimental group to see if a implantation of a proprioceptive program for the wrist has benefits on pain, function and quality of life.

Detailed Description

Distal radius fracture (DRF) is one of the most frequent injuries in the upper limb, corresponding to 1/6 of the total fractures of the body. It appears mostly in \>50 years old women (due to osteoporosis and menopause) but it is also frequent in middle age men as a consequence of a big trauma during sport activities or working. This injury can be treated conservative of surgically, but regardless of the treatment, it always has a period of immobilization between 3 and 6 weeks. The term "proprioception" was firstly described by Sherrington in 1906 as "perception" of body position and movement. The presence and quantity of mechanoreceptors in the joint determine its proprioceptive capacity. In the 1990s, the presence of mechanoreceptors on the wrist was described, and subsequent studies allowed us to determine that the dorsal and ulnar ligaments of the wrist have a rich innervation of mechanoreceptors. With these findings, we can hypothesize various clinical applications, both for working on wrist proprioception in the early stages of proprioceptive reeducation without risking tissue damage and for neuromuscular work after fracture consolidation, with the goal of regaining fluid and balanced movement. Previous studies on the ankle, knee, and shoulder have shown that the implementation of a proprioceptive program in the rehabilitation process can improve traumatic instability and pain. Given that the wrist shares similarities with these joints in terms of proprioceptive innervation, we can hypothesize that a specific proprioceptive exercise program for the wrist may be beneficial in the recovery after a wrist fracture.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 7, 2024
End Date
September 1, 2024
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Leire Cruz-Gambero

Principal Investigator

University of Malaga

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult (equal or more than 18 y/o).
  • Suffering a wrist fracture and have passed immobilization period.
  • Agree and sign informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not had suffered a wrist fracture, being in the immobilization period or not authorized by his/her orthopedic surgeon to start with rehabilitation.
  • Suffer any mental, cognitive, neurological or musculoskeletal disorder.
  • Previous injury or pathology of the upper limb affected.
  • Previos surgery on the upper limb affected.
  • Have cervical pathology/impairment.
  • Suffering from blindness.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in function related with daily living activities

Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months.

Measured with QuickDASH. 11 items, 0=no disability and 100= total disability

Change in perception of pain, referred to wrist

Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months

Pain measured with Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 0= no pain and 10=worst pain

Change in hand and wrist function related with difficulties in performing daily living activities

Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months

Measured with Patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE). 15 items in 2 subscales, function (10 items) and pain (5 items). Punctuation could be from 0 to 50 in each subscale, where 50 points means worse pain/function.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in strength(Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months.)
  • Change in Perception of Quality of life(Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months)
  • Changes in proprioception, position terms(Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months)
  • Change in range of motion of the wrist(Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months.)
  • Changes in proprioception, strength terms(Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months)

Similar Trials