Feasibility of the Trunk and Upper Extremity Assessments for Teleassessment in Children Cerebral Palsy

Completed

• Conditions: Cerebral Palsy (CP)

• Registration Number: NCT06707831
• Lead Sponsor: Hacettepe University

Brief Summary

This study was conducted to investigate the suitability of trunk and upper extremity assessments used within the scope of the ICF for tele-assessment in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (CP).

Detailed Description

A total of 36 children aged between 4-18 years with hemiplegic CP and their parents were included in the study. Children underwent evaluations on two occasions: one in face-to-face within a clinical setting, and the other through tele-assessment using video conferencing. This video conference session was recorded to be later reviewed and scored by two separate evaluators. For the assessment, the Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS) was used for trunk control, the Upper Limb Physician Rating Scale (ULPRS) for upper extremity joint movement, the Upper Limb Selective Control Scale (SCUES) for selective ability, and the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST) for skill quality. The bilateral hand use of children was assessed using the Abilhand-Kids, hemiplegic hand use with the Pediatric Motor Activity Log (PMAL), participation levels using The Assessment of Life-Habits (Life-H), and environmental factors were assessed using the European Child Environment Questionnaire (ECEQ), both face-to-face and through online surveys sent to families. Intra- and inter-rater reliability was determined by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and internal consistency was determined by Cronbach alpha coefficient (a). To determine validity, known group validity was examined based on the functional levels of children and concurrent validity was examined based on face-to-face assessment results. It was found that the internal consistency and both the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the TCMS (ICC: 0.82-0.91, p\<0.05; α: 0.88-0.91), SCUES (ICC: 0.93-0.97, p\<0.05; α: 0.93-0.94), ULPRS (ICC: 0.90-0.96, p\<0.05; α: 0.94-0.95), and QUEST (ICC: 0.86-0.93, p\<0.05; α: 0.93-0.94), conducted through both face-to-face assessment and tele-assessment by a physiotherapist or under supervision of a physiotherapist, were high to excellent. It was found that the tele-assessment reliability of Abilhand-Kids (ICC: 0.707, p\<0.05) and PMAL (ICC: 0.60-0.70, p\<0.05) was moderate; whereas, Life-H (ICC: 0.24) and ECEQ (ICC: 0.311) were determined to be weak. As a result, it was found that TCMS, SCUES, ULPRS, QUEST, Abilhand-Kids, and PMAL are suitable, valid, and reliable methods for tele-assessment; whereas, ECEQ and Life-H are not suitable for tele-assessment. These findings might partially diminish the necessity for the evaluation of children with CP in clinical settings, opening the way for suitable assessment methods. By ensuring equal opportunities for children with CP who cannot physically reach the clinic due to various reasons, reliable assessments can be conducted, contributing to the development of personalized tele-rehabilitation programs for the child. Although more extensive studies will be needed in the future, we expect transport costs to fall.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2022-01-01
• Primary Completion: 2023-05-01
• Study Completion: 2024-05-01
• Status Verified: 2024-11
• Study First Submitted: 2024-11-25
• Study First Submitted QC: 2024-11-25
• Last Update Submitted: 2024-11-25
• Study First Posted: 2024-11-27
• Last Update Posted: 2024-11-27

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 36

Inclusion Criteria

• Diagnosed with unilateral (hemiplegic) cerebral palsy
• Being 4 - 18 years old
• Classified as Communication Function Classification System (CFCS) level 1 or 2
• Classified as Visual Function Classification System (VFCS) level 1 or 2
• Parents are able to read and write in Turkish

Exclusion Criteria

• Diagnosed with epilepsy and active seizures in addition to CP
• Unable to use video call methods
• Refused to participate in the study
• Unable to co-operate during assessments
• The one who refused to continue with the assessments
• Those who had health problems during the assessments and could not continue the assessments

Study & Design

• Study Type: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS)	5 minutes	The TCMS is a clinical tool used to assess trunk control in children with cerebral palsy. It evaluates both static and dynamic aspects of trunk control through tasks divided into three subscales: static sitting balance, dynamic sitting balance and dynamic reaching. It has total 15 items and each item is scored on a scale of 0 to 3, where higher scores indicate better trunk control. The total score ranges from 0 to 58, with subscale scores providing insights into specific components of trunk function.
Upper Limb Physician Rating Scale (ULPRS)	5 minutes	The ULPRS is a clinical assessment tool used to evaluate upper limb function in individuals with conditions like cerebral palsy. It focuses on assessing movement quality, range of motion, and functional use of the upper extremities during specific tasks or movements. The scoring typically reflects the severity of impairment, with lower scores indicating greater functional limitations. It is commonly used to monitor progress and guide treatment planning. Typically, items are scored individually, and the total score represents the overall severity of impairment or functionality.
Selective Control of Upper Extremity Scale (SCUES)	5 minutes	The SCUES is a clinical assessment tool designed to measure selective motor control in the upper extremities, particularly in individuals with neurological conditions such as cerebral palsy. It evaluates the ability to perform isolated, precise movements in the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and fingers without using compensatory patterns. Each limb is scored on a scale from 0 to 3 for each joint, where 0 indicates no selective movement and 3 indicates completely selective movement. The total score for a limb ranges from 0 to 15, with higher scores reflecting greater selectivity.
Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST)	5 minutes	The QUEST is a standardized tool designed to assess upper extremity function in children with neuromotor impairments, particularly cerebral palsy. It evaluates four domains: dissociated movements, grasp, protective extension, and weight-bearing, with 36 items scored from 0 (cannot perform) to 2 (performs fully). The scores are summed for each domain, and a total percentage score is calculated, with higher scores reflecting better movement quality and function. The QUEST is useful for guiding therapy and tracking progress over time.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Abilhand-Kids	5 minutes	The Abilhand-Kids is a parent-reported questionnaire designed to assess manual ability in children with upper limb impairments, particularly those with cerebral palsy or other developmental disabilities. It measures the child's ability to perform daily activities requiring the use of both hands in a variety of functional contexts. The questionnaire includes 21 items, each rated on a 3-point scale: 0 (impossible), 1 (difficult), 2 (easy). The raw scores are converted to a linear Rasch scale, providing a standardized measure of manual ability. There is no fixed total score; instead, the Rasch analysis generates an overall ability estimate expressed in logits, allowing for comparison across individuals and groups. Higher scores represent the success in daily activities requiring the use of both hands.
Pediatric Motor Activity Log (PMAL)	5 minutes	The PMAL is a parent-reported assessment tool designed to measure the frequency and quality of motor activities performed by children with upper limb impairments, such as cerebral palsy. It focuses on how often and how well the child uses their affected arm in daily activities. It consists of 30 items, each rated on two scales: frequency and quality (both from 1 to 5). "Frequency" reflects how often the child uses their affected arm during specific activities, while "quality" reflects the child's ability to perform the activity. Scores for each item are summed to create a total score for both frequency and quality, with separate scores for each. Higher scores indicate better motor function, meaning the child uses their affected arm more frequently and with higher quality in daily activities. The total score is the sum of the frequency and quality scores, and higher
The Assessment of Life-Habits (Life-H)	5 minutes	The Life-H is a tool designed to evaluate the impact of a disability on an individual's ability to participate in daily life activities, covering various domains of life such as mobility, communication, social participation, and self-care. It is used across different age groups, including children and adults, with a variety of conditions, particularly those with physical or neurological impairments. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 to 9, where 0 indicates no difficulty, and 9 indicates complete difficulty or inability to perform the activity. The raw scores for each domain can then be converted to a standardized score ranging from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate greater difficulty or more significant limitations in life habits. A higher total score reflects more challenges in daily life participation, while a lower score indicates better function and fewer limitations.
European Child Environment Questionnaire (ECEQ)	5 minutes	The ECEQ is a tool used to assess the impact of environmental factors on the participation and daily activities of children, particularly those with disabilities. It evaluates various environmental domains, including the home, school, and community, to determine how these settings either support or limit a child's ability to engage in everyday tasks. The ECEQ helps to identify barriers and areas where environmental modifications or supports may be needed to enhance the child's quality of life and participation.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hacettepe University, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation; 🇹🇷 Ankara, Turkey