Shoulder ID™ Primary Reversed Glenoid Outcomes Clinical Study
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis ShoulderTraumatic Arthritis of Right Shoulder Region (Diagnosis)Shoulder DeformityRotator Cuff TearsOsteoarthritis ShoulderFracture, HumeralAvascular Necrosis of the Head of Humerus
- Interventions
- Device: Shoulder iD™ Primary Reversed Glenoid
- Registration Number
- NCT05868148
- Lead Sponsor
- Stryker Trauma and Extremities
- Brief Summary
The goal of the Shoulder iD™ Primary Reversed Glenoid Outcomes Clinical Study is to collect safety and performance data on the commercially available Shoulder iD™ Primary Reversed Glenoid device. The study will learn about standard device use in adult patients who have a functional deltoid muscle and massive and non-repairable rotator cuff tear. The main questions it aims to answer are:
* What is the average improvement in patient-reported shoulder function after 2 years when compared to before the surgery, and
* What is the rate of surgical revisions needed over a 10 year period
Patients will be asked to will be asked to regularly attend their check-up visits with their surgeon (including having x-rays or CT images taken to check their shoulder and implant), to complete questionnaires to report how their shoulder is doing, and to tell their surgeon when they notice any changes.
- Detailed Description
The Shoulder iD™ Primary Reversed Glenoid Outcomes Clinical Study is a Global, single arm, multicenter, prospective, non-significant risk Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) study, designed to collect safety and performance data on designated commercially available Shoulder iD™ Primary Reversed Glenoid.
The objective of this multicenter study is to collect clinical data at baseline, surgery, immediate post-op, and annually through 10 years post-operation, on related clinical complications and clinical outcomes of market-approved Shoulder iD™ Primary Reversed Glenoid, to demonstrate safety and performance of these implants in a real-world setting.
The primary outcome measure is the average improvement in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score from baseline to 24 months.
Secondary outcome measures include the following assessments to be evaluated throughout the patient's participation in the study:
* Constant Score (years 1, 2, 5 and 10 only)
* Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) Score
* Patient Satisfaction
* EQ-5D-5L
Radiologic imaging: Patient images (X-ray or CT) completed at baseline and in-person follow-ups will be analyzed for standard radiographic findings, including, but not limited to: device migration, component breakage, radiolucencies and bone characteristics.
Revision rate and survivorship will be assessed annually and at any time upon request for regulatory purposes such as PMCF or Clinical Evaluation Report (CER) updates. The cumulative incidence of device revisions and reoperations will be reported as well as Kaplan-Meier estimates for implant survival.
Adverse events will be evaluated from inclusion to last follow-up and will be documented during the study and categorized as whether they are serious and whether they are related to the Sponsor device or implant procedure.
During the study, patients will undergo the following procedures, which are standard of care:
* Patient information and Consent (as applicable per local regulation),
* Inclusion/non-inclusion criteria,
* Demography, Height \& Weight,
* Surgical history and relevant medical history,
* Physician exams (Range of Motion and Strength measurements),
* Patient questionnaires (ASES, Constant, SANE, Patient Satisfaction, EQ-5D-5L),
* Shoulder study implant \& surgery related data,
* CT scans, x-rays
* AE / SAE collection (continuous recording).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 200
- 18 years or older at the time of the informed consent or non-opposition (when applicable).
- Informed and willing to sign an informed consent form approved by IRB or EC (when applicable).
- Willing and able to comply with the requirements of the study protocol.
- Considered a candidate for shoulder arthroplasty using a study device.
- Meets indications for use requirements or other local, regional, or geographic specific regulatory requirements
- Patients who are not able to comply with the study procedures based on the judgment of the assessor (e.g., cannot comprehend study questions, inability to keep scheduled assessment times).
- Patient belongs to a vulnerable group of patients, including minor patients, those unable to decide for themselves to participate or needing a Legally Authorized Representative (LAR), or others who could be subject to coercion (patients who may not be acting on their own initiative) (referred to as a "vulnerable subject" in section 3.44 of the ISO 14155:2020).
- Active local or systemic infection, sepsis, or osteomyelitis
- Poor bone quality, where there could be considerable migration of the prothesis and/or a chance of fracture of the humerus or glenoid (reassessed at time of surgery)
- Significant injury to the brachial plexus
- Inadequate bone stock in the proximal humerus or glenoid fossa for supporting the device components
- Neuromuscular disease (e.g., joint neuropathy) Known allergy to one of the product materials
- Metabolic disorders which may impair bone formation
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Shoulder iD device implant Shoulder iD™ Primary Reversed Glenoid Adult patients who have reached skeletal maturity, with a functional deltoid muscle, and massive and non-repairable rotator cuff tear within one or more indications and zero contraindications who will receive the Shoulder iD Primary Reversed Glenoid device to replace the shoulder joint.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Safety: Revision rate and device survivorship from date of inclusion until date of study exit (study completion or early termination for any cause), assessed up to 10 years The cumulative incidence of device revisions and reoperations
Performance: change in functional ability of the treated shoulder from baseline to 24 months The average change in functional ability as measured by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. ASES is an absolute score ranging from 0 to 100 where a higher score indicates better shoulder function.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Performance: change in patient self-assessment of current status of their treated shoulder from date of inclusion until date of study exit (study completion or early termination for any cause), assessed up to 10 years Assessed via the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score collected from patients via ePRO at baseline, 3 months, and annually. The rating is from 0% to 100% with 100% being normal.
Performance: change in patient self-rated quality of life from date of inclusion until date of study exit (study completion or early termination for any cause), assessed up to 10 years Assessed via EQ-5D-5L Five Dimensions Quality of Life measurement general health questionnaire collected from patients via ePRO at baseline, 3 months and annually. Each dimension is measured on 5 levels from 1 being no problems to 5 being extreme problems.
Performance: change in patient satisfaction with their shoulder from date of inclusion until date of study exit (study completion or early termination for any cause), assessed up to 10 years Satisfaction rating collected from patients via ePRO at baseline, 3 months and annually. Rating options are: Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Dissatisfied, and Very Dissatisfied.
Performance: change in level of pain and ability to carry out normal daily activities of the patient from date of inclusion until date of study exit (study completion or early termination for any cause), assessed up to 10 years Assessed via the Constant-Murley Shoulder score collected at baseline, years 1, 2, 5 and 10 and any other standard collection timepoint. In this score, 35 points are allocated for subjective assessments of pain and activities of daily living and 65 points are available for objective measures of rage of movement and shoulder strength. A score of 100 is a healthy shoulder.
Safety: Adverse Event rate and assessments from date of treatment until date of study exit (study completion or early termination for any cause), assessed up to 10 years Cumulative incidence of procedure and/or device related events (ADE, AESI, SAE, SADE)
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (7)
Carilion Clinic
🇺🇸Roanoke, Virginia, United States
UCSF
🇺🇸San Francisco, California, United States
Coastal Orthopedics
🇺🇸Bradenton, Florida, United States
Cleveland Clinic
🇺🇸Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Jameson Crane Sports Medicine Institute OSU
🇺🇸Columbus, Ohio, United States
UT Health Science center - Houston
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States
CHRISTUS Mother Frances Research
🇺🇸Tyler, Texas, United States