跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02980055
NCT02980055Unknown2 期

Comparison of Root Coverage of Gingival Recessions Using Connective Tissue Graft and Collagen Matrix

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte0 个研究点目标入组 46 人开始时间: 2017年2月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
2 期
入组人数
46
主要终点
gingival recession

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to analyze the percentage of root coverage in Miller class I and II gingival recessions using connective tissue graft and collagen matrix with a two years follow-up.

详细描述

A sample calculation using a mean of 2.92 mm of the quantity of keratinized mucosa obtained after six months in the most recent study (McGUIRE; SCHEYER, 2014) using the same collagen matrix with a standard deviation of ± 0.88 mm, a difference of 0.4 mm being chosen as statistically significant. In addition, a 95% bilateral confidence interval and 80% power were used. A sample of 38 individuals per group was obtained. In addition, a 20% loss is expected during follow-up, a total of 46 individuals should be evaluated.

Periapical radiographic examinations should be performed before the collection of data to confirm the absence of bone loss. The following clinical parameters should be evaluated in both test and control groups: visible plaque index, gingival bleeding index, gingival recession, keratinized mucosa width and thickness, probing depth, bleeding on probing and periodontal biotype for each teeth with a North Carolina periodontal probe. The periodontal biotype for each teeth should be rated as thin or thick, according to probe transparency during probing depth. For statistical purposes, percentages of faces with gingival recession should be calculated. These parameters should be evaluated at baseline and at one, three and six months, one and two years post-therapy.

Clinical parameters should be collected by two operators, calibrated by the Kappa test for the keratinized mucosa width and thickness, periodontal biotype, probing depth and gingival recession.

After the inclusion of the patients, anamnesis and initial examination were performed. The subjects should be divided randomly, using a simple draw, in the following two groups: test - (collagen matrix) and control - (connective tissue graft) placebo associated with basic periodontal therapy). The data should be analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, with parametric tests, through the software package Social Sciences (SPSS), version 17.0 (free version).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 45 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Gingival recessions of class I or II types according to Miller (1985), in contralateral, superior or inferior premolars and / or canines;
  • •Fine periodontal biotype characterized by the transparency of the North Carolina probe when introduced into the periodontal sulcus (KAN et al., 2003);
  • •The teeth with gingival recession should not be restored in their cervical portion;
  • •Periodontal health characterized by absence of bleeding at probing, depth of probing less than 3 mm;
  • •Visible Plaque Index and Gingival Bleeding Index less than or equal to 30%.

排除标准

  • •Orthodontic appliances;
  • •Fixed or removable prostheses involving the premolar teeth with gingival recession;
  • •Being a smoker;
  • •Pregnancy or lactation;
  • •Systemic diseases that may interfere with healing or periodontal health (diabetes, leukemia, hypertension, among others).

研究组 & 干预措施

Test: collagen matrix

Experimental

Root coverage using collagen matrix

干预措施: collagen matrix (Procedure)

Control: connective tissue graft

Active Comparator

Root coverage using connective tissue graft

干预措施: connective tissue graft (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

gingival recession

时间窗: twenty-four months

gingival recession

时间窗: baseline

gingival recession

时间窗: three months

gingival recession

时间窗: six months

gingival recession

时间窗: twelve months

gingival recession

时间窗: eighteen months

次要结局

  • Width of keratinized mucosa(baseline and three, six, twelve, eighteen and twenty-four months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Karyna de Melo Menezes

Principal Invastigator

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

相似试验