The Value of the Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio in the Diagnosis of Bacterial Infections

Completed

• Conditions: Bacterial Infections

• Registration Number: NCT02848534
• Lead Sponsor: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens

Brief Summary

The "gold standard" for diagnosing a bacterial infection is isolation of the pathogenic germ, which is not easy in routine clinical practice.

Conventional markers do not have sufficient diagnostic value for making a rapid diagnosis on admission. A 2004 literature calculated the diagnostic values of C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) levels for the diagnosis of bacterial infections, relative to other causes of inflammation. For CRP, the sensitivity was 75% (95% CI: 62%-84%) and the specificity was 67% (95% CI: 56%-77%). For PCT, the sensitivity was 88% (95% CI: 62%-84%) and the specificity was 81% (95% CI: 67%-90%).

The first cellular immune response to infection consists of the mobilization of polynuclear neutrophils from the bone marrow to the infection site under the effect of pre-inflammatory cytokines, as well as the apoptosis of lymphocytes and their sequestration at the infection site. This results in lymphopenia and the elevated polynuclear neutrophil count (PNN) observed in bacterial infections.

Hence, it is legitimate to hypothesize that the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) can be used in the diagnosis of bacterial infection. This ratio's value in the diagnosis of sepsis in the emergency department was studied and the researchers found higher diagnostic values than for CRP and PCT.

The NLR's potential value in the diagnosis of a bacterial infection in a context of fever or hyperthermia (regardless of the presence or absence of bacteraemia) has not been studied before. This ratio could also be compared with standard biomarkers (CRP and PCT levels, the white blood cell count and the PNN).

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2016-02-06
• Study First Submitted: 2016-07-26
• Study First Submitted QC: 2016-07-26
• Study First Posted: 2016-07-28
• Primary Completion: 2016-09-12
• Study Completion: 2016-09-12
• Status Verified: 2018-08
• Last Update Submitted: 2018-08-09
• Last Update Posted: 2018-08-10

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 479

Inclusion Criteria

• All consecutive patients admitted for fever/inflammatory syndrome to the internal medicine department at Amiens University Hospital between January 1 st 2011 and December 31 st 2014 (hyperthermia > 38°5 and/or inflammatory syndrome, defined as an increase in CRP >10 mg/L).

Exclusion Criteria

• Known conditions or treatments that may influence the blood count (haematological and neoplastic diseases, seropositivity for HIV, chemotherapy, and corticotherapy).
• Pregnancy.
• A course of antibiotics administered in the 48 hours before the
• blood count (risk of sample negativity).

Study & Design

• Study Type: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
NLR / white blood cell count	1 day	To compare the NLR with other commonly used inflammatory markers for the diagnosis of bacterial infection in patients admitted for fever and/or inflammatory syndrome to an internal medicine department.
NLR / PNN	1 day	To compare the NLR with other commonly used inflammatory markers for the diagnosis of bacterial infection in patients admitted for fever and/or inflammatory syndrome to an internal medicine department.
NLR / CRP	1 day	To compare the NLR with other commonly used inflammatory markers for the diagnosis of bacterial infection in patients admitted for fever and/or inflammatory syndrome to an internal medicine department.
NLR / PCT	1 day	To compare the NLR with other commonly used inflammatory markers for the diagnosis of bacterial infection in patients admitted for fever and/or inflammatory syndrome to an internal medicine department.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

CHU Amiens Picardie; 🇫🇷 Amiens, France