跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04000477
NCT04000477终止不适用

Endocervical Curettage Performed With a Kevorkian Curette Versus Cytobrush in Patients With ASC-H, LSIL, ASCUS HPV Positive and Non-contributory Colposcopy (ZT3) Smear or Atypical Pap Smear With Positive HPV Test

University Hospital, Lille1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 3 人开始时间: 2019年11月5日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
终止
发起方
入组人数
3
试验地点
1
主要终点
Percentage of sampling failures

研究概览

简要总结

The recommendations on the method and the realization of the cervico-uterine smears are clear. With regard to performing endocervical curettage, several methods are possible without precise consensus. In general, the Kevorkian curette is widely used. However, it is often reported by doctors and patients that curettage is painful. Some articles show that the cytobrush would be less painful. While keeping a percentage of correct curettage failures, it is sought to show that the cytobrush would improve the comfort of the patient during curettage.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
25 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Women followed for a cervical pathology requiring endocervical curettage:
  • •AGC type (glandular cell atypia) with positive HPV test
  • •Frottis ASC-H, LSIL, ASCUS HPV + with non-contributive colposcopy (ZT3)

排除标准

  • •Pregnant woman
  • •Women under the age of 25 or over 65
  • •Stenosis of the neck complete or tight not allowing the possible insertion of a curette (inadequate size cervical orifice and material)
  • •Presence of a vaginal lesion on colposcopic examination

研究组 & 干预措施

Kevorkian curette

Experimental

干预措施: Kevorkian curette (Device)

Cytobrush

Experimental

干预措施: Cytobrush (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Percentage of sampling failures

时间窗: once time, Baseline

Unsatisfactory sampling will be defined by a specimen containing \<20 endocervical cells, \<3 epithelial flaps, and one specimen without stroma.

次要结局

  • Pain Assessment Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)(once time, Baseline)

研究者

发起方
University Hospital, Lille
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验