MedPath

The HEADWIND Study - Part 3

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Diabetes
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Interventions
Other: Controlled hypoglycaemic state while driving with a driving simulator
Registration Number
NCT05183191
Lead Sponsor
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Brief Summary

To analyse driving behavior of individuals with type 1 diabetes in eu- and mild hypoglycaemia using a validated research driving simulator. Based on the driving variables provided by the simulator the investigators aim at establishing algorithms capable of discriminating eu- and hypoglycemic driving patterns using machine learning classifiers.

Detailed Description

Hypoglycaemia is among the most relevant acute complications of diabetes mellitus. During hypoglycaemia physical, psychomotor, executive and cognitive function significantly deteriorate. These are important prerequisites for safe driving. Accordingly, hypoglycaemia has consistently been shown to be associated with an increased risk of driving accidents and is, therefore, regarded as one of the relevant factors in traffic safety. Therefore, this study aims at evaluating a machine-learning based approach using in-vehicle data to detect hypoglycemia during driving at an early stage.

During controlled eu- and hypoglycemia, participants with type 1 diabetes mellitus drive in a validated driving simulator while in-vehicle data are recorded. Based on this data, the investigators aim at building machine learning classifiers to detect hypoglycemia during driving.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
11
Inclusion Criteria
  • Informed Consent as documented by signature
  • Type 1 Diabetes mellitus as defined by WHO for at least 1 year or is confirmed C-peptide negative (<100pmol/l with concomitant blood glucose >4 mmol/l)
  • Subjects aged between 21-60 years
  • HbA1c ≤ 9.0 % based on analysis from central laboratory
  • Functional insulin treatment with insulin pump therapy or basis-bolus insulin for at least 3 months with good knowledge of insulin self-management
  • Passed driver's examination at least 3 years before study inclusion. Possession of a valid Swiss driver's license.
  • Active driving in the last 6 months before the study.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Contraindications to the drug used to induce hypoglycaemia (insulin aspart), known hypersensitivity or allergy to the adhesive patch used to attach the glucose sensor
  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Intention to become pregnant during the study
  • Lack of safe contraception, defined as: Female participants of childbearing potential, not using and not willing to continue using a medically reliable method of contraception for the entire study duration, such as oral, injectable, or implantable contraceptives, or intrauterine contraceptive devices, or who are not using any other method considered sufficiently reliable by the investigator in individual cases.
  • Other clinically significant concomitant disease states as judged by the investigator (e.g., renal failure, hepatic dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, etc.)
  • Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant
  • Participation in another study with an investigational drug within the 30 days preceding and during the present study
  • Previous enrolment into the current study
  • Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons
  • Total daily insulin dose >2 IU/kg/day.
  • Specific concomitant therapy washout requirements prior to and/or during study participation
  • Physical or psychological disease is likely to interfere with the normal conduct of the study and interpretation of the study results as judged by the investigator (especially coronary heart disease or epilepsy).
  • Current treatment with drugs known to interfere with metabolism (e.g. systemic corticosteroids, etc.) or driving performance (e.g. opioids, benzodiazepines)
  • Patients not capable of driving with the driving simulator or patients experiencing motion sickness during the simulator test driving session.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Intervention groupControlled hypoglycaemic state while driving with a driving simulator-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Diagnostic accuracy of the hypoglycemia warning system using in-vehicle data to detect hypoglycemia (blood glucose <3.9mmol/L) quantified as the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC ROC).240 minutes

The machine learning model is developed and evaluated based on in-vehicle data generated in eu- and hypoglycemia. Detection performance of hypoglycemia is quantified as AUROC.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change of electrodermal activity over the glycemic trajectory240 minutes

Electrodermal activity is recorded using wearables.

Change of gaze coordinates over the glycemic trajectory.240 minutes

Gaze coordinates are recorded using an eye-tracker device.

Change of head pose over the glycemic trajectory.240 minutes

Head pose (position/rotation) are recorded using an eye-tracker device.

Change of heart rate variability over the glycemic trajectory240 minutes

Heart rate variability is recorded using a holter-ECG device and wearables.

CGM accuracy over the glycemic trajectory240 minutes

CGM values will be recorded using a CGM sensor (Dexcom G6). Venous blood glucose is considered as the reference. Accuracy will be quantified using mean absolute relative difference (MARD) from the gold-standard and using the Clarke error grid.

Change in driving features over the glycemic trajectory.240 minutes

Driving signals are recorded using a driving simulator.

Hypoglycemic symptoms over the glycemic trajectory.240 minutes

Hypoglycemic symptoms are rated using a validated questionnaire (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 48, a higher score means more symptoms)

Technology acceptance of the hypoglycemia warning system240 minutes

Technology acceptance is measured with user experience questionnaires, such as the Unified Technology Acceptance and Use of Technology Questionnaire from Venkatesh et al. (2012) and free words associations.

Diagnostic accuracy of the hypoglycemia warning system using wearable data to detect hypoglycemia (blood glucose <3.9mmol/L) quantified as the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC ROC).240 minutes

The machine learning model is developed and evaluated based on wearable data recorded in eu- and hypoglycemia. Detection performance of hypoglycemia is quantified as AUROC.

Diagnostic accuracy of the hypoglycemia warning system using wearable data and recordings of the CGM system to detect hypoglycemia (blood glucose <3.9mmol/L) quantified as sensitivity and specificity.240 minutes

The CGM device is in use during controlled eu- and hypoglycemia. Detection performance of hypoglycemia is quantified as sensitivity and specificity.

Change of heart rate over the glycemic trajectory240 minutes

Heart rate is recorded using a holter-ECG device and wearables.

Time course of the hormonal response over the glycemic trajectoryTime Frame: 240 minutes

Epinephrine, norepinephrine, glucagon, cortisol and growth hormone are measured at pre-defined time points.

Self assessment of driving performance over the glycemic trajectory.240 minutes

Participants rate their driving performance on a 7-point Lickert Scale (lower value means poorer driving performance).

Diagnostic accuracy of the hypoglycemia warning system using in-vehicle data and recordings of the continous glucose monitoring (CGM) system to detect hypoglycemia (blood glucose <3.9mmol/L) quantified as sensitivity and specificity.240 minutes

The CGM device is in use during controlled eu- and hypoglycemia. Detection performance of hypoglycemia is quantified as sensitivity and specificity.

Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)2 weeks, from screening to close out visit in each participant

Serious Adverse Events will be recorded at each study visit.

Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)2 weeks, from screening to close out visit in each participant

Adverse Events will be recorded at each study visit.

Emotional response to hypoglycemia warning system240 minutes

Physiological response is measured using an electro-dermal activity sensor (skin conductance) and eye tracker (eye blinks). Self-reported emotional response is assessed with scales (e.g., valence, arousal, annoyance, sense of urgency).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology, Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism

🇨🇭

Bern, Switzerland

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath