Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01927185
NCT01927185
Completed
Not Applicable

Long-versus Short-Axis Ultrasound Guidance for Subclavian Vein Cannulation

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma1 site in 1 country190 target enrollmentJune 2013

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Vascular Access Complication
Sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma
Enrollment
190
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Success rate
Status
Completed
Last Updated
9 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Central venous catheterization is commonly applied in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The subclavian vein has lower risk of infection and provides more patients comfort. However central venous catheterization may results in complications such as pneumothorax, hemothorax or arterial puncture. It has been suggested that ultrasound (US) guidance could improve the success rate, reduce the number of needle passes and decrease complications. Two different real-time 2-dimensional US techniques can be employed in the insertion of central venous catheters. The first technique involves real-time US-guided cannulation of subclavian vein using a long axis/in-plane approach. The second one involves real-time US-guided using a short axis/out-off-plane approach. However to date no studies have compared their efficacy and safety. The purpose of this study was to compare the US-guided long-axis versus short-axis approach for the SCV catheterization in adult critical care patients.

Detailed Description

The two techniques used for vessel visualization are far different: The Short-Axis (SA) approach attempts to view the vessel in cross-section while venous access is obtained. The strength of the SA approach is that the vein is centered under the transducer and that the midpoint of the transducer becomes a reference point for the insertion of the needle, and that at the same time is possible to visualize SC artery and the pleural line. SA approach is easy to learn by novice sonologists. The Long-Axis (LA) approach employs a technique that views the length of the vessel during cannulation.For this reason, with LA approach is possible to visualize the needle advance during the entire procedure from the soft tissues until the lumen of the vein, but SC artery and pleural line are not visualized in the same scan. For LA approach, practice is required to keep the needle precisely within the image and care must be taken to avoid the probe inadvertently moving away from the target structure.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
June 2013
End Date
March 2016
Last Updated
9 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Vezzani Antonella

Chief of the Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • aged =\>18 years
  • patients who needed central venous catheter for clinical reasons

Exclusion Criteria

  • aged \<18a years

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Success rate

Time Frame: up to 4 hours

Secondary Outcomes

  • Central line-associated blood stream infection(days 0-21)
  • Complication rate(Hours: 0-6-12-24)
  • Access Time(Hours: 0,1)
  • Number of attempts(hours: 0-2)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials