MedPath

Improving Patient Outcomes by Selective Implantation of the Zephyr EBV - Study

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction With Endobronchial Valve
COPD Patients With Homogeneous Emphysema
Interventions
Device: Endobronchial Valve
Registration Number
NCT02025205
Lead Sponsor
Pulmonx International Sàrl
Brief Summary

The aim of this prospective, randomized, controlled, one-way crossover study is to assess and compare the efficacy of the Zephyr endobronchial valves vs. Standard of Care (SoC) in patients suffering from COPD with Homogeneous Emphysema. Patients will be followed up for 12 months after randomization. Patients in the SoC arm will crossover to the EBV treatment arm after the 6-month visit and will be followed up for 6 additional months.The primary objective is the variation of FEV1 between baseline and 3-month follow-up visit. The secondary objectives will evaluate quality of life, exercise capacity, dyspnea (including BODE index) changes, target lobe volume reduction, as well as safety outcomes.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
93
Inclusion Criteria
  • Homogeneous emphysema
  • 15% ≤ FEV1 ≤ 45% predicted
  • TLC > 100% predicted
  • RV ≥ 200% predicted
  • 6MWT ≥ 150 m
  • Non-smoker > 8 weeks prior to study entry
  • Absence of Collateral Ventilation in the target lobe
Exclusion Criteria
  • Active pulmonary infection
  • More than 3 exacerbations with hospitalizations over the past 12 months
  • Pulmonary hypertension (sPAP > 45 mmHg)
  • MI or other relevant CV events in the past 6 months
  • Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency
  • Bronchiectasis
  • Prior LVR or LVRS procedure
  • > 20% difference in perfusion between right and left lung
  • Hypercapnia (paCO2 > 55 mmHg
  • Asthma
  • Use of more than 25 mg/day prednisolone or equivalent
  • Severe bullous emphysema
  • Systemic or malignant disease with high death probability within 12 months

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
ELVR with Endobronchial ValvesEndobronchial ValveEndoscopic Lung Volume Reduction with Zephyr Endobronchial Valve
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 s (FEV1) (ITT Population)At baseline and after 3 months

Percentage change in FEV1 at 3 months relative to Baseline in the EBV group, compared to the SoC group.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percent Change in Target Lobe Volume for EBV Group (ITT Population)At baseline and after 3 months

Target Lobe Volume Reduction (TLVR) was evaluated by quantitative analysis of HRCT scans at Baseline and at 3-months post-valve placement to measure the target lobe volume.

Percent of Subjects in the EBV Group With a Target Lobe Volume Reduction (TLVR) of ≥ 350ml at 3 MonthsAt baseline and after 3 months

The threshold of TLVR ≥350 mL was used to determine the proportion of subjects that achieved this amount of TLVR in the EBV group.

Percent Change in Residual Volume (RV) at 3 MonthsAt baseline and after 3 months

Mean percent change in Residual Volume relative to Baseline at 3 months between the EBV and SoC groups

Absolute Change in Target Lobe Volume for EBV Group (ITT Population)At baseline and after 3 months

Target Lobe Volume Reduction (TLVR) was evaluated by quantitative analysis of HRCT scans at Baseline and at 3-months post-valve placement to measure the target lobe volume.

Absolute Change in FEV1 (L) Post Bronchodilator at 3 MonthsAt baseline and after 3 months

The mean absolute change in FEV1(L) relative to Baseline at 3 months between the EBV and SoC groups

Absolute Change in FEV1 (% Predicted) Post Bronchodilator at 3 MonthsAt baseline and after 3 months

The mean absolute change in FEV1(% Predicted) relative to Baseline at 3 months between the EBV and SoC groups

Absolute Change in Residual Volume (RV) at 3 MonthsAt baseline and after 3 months

Mean absolute change in Residual Volume relative to Baseline at 3 months between the EBV and SoC groups

Percent Predicted Change in Residual Volume at 3 MonthsAt baseline and after 3 months

Percent predicted change in RV relative to Baseline at 3 months between the EBV and SoC groups

Absolute Change in Six-Minute Walk Distance at 3 MonthsAt baseline and after 3 months

Mean absolute change in the 6MWD from Baseline to 3 months in the EBV group compared to the SOC

Percent Change in Six-Minute Walk Distance at 3 MonthsAt baseline and after 3 months

Mean percent change in the 6MWD from Baseline to 3 months in the EBV group compared to the SOC

Absolute Change in the SGRQ Total Score From Baseline to 3 MonthsAt baseline and after 3 months

Mean absolute change in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire Total Score from Baseline to 3 months in the EBV group compared to the SoC group. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more limitations.

Percent Change (%) in the SGRQ Total Score From Baseline to 3 MonthsAt baseline and after 3 months

Mean percent change in the SGRQ Total Score from Baseline to 3 months in the EBV group compared to the SoC group

Absolute Change in the mMRC Dyspnea Score From Baseline to 3 MonthsAt baseline and after 3 months

Mean absolute change in the Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnea Score from Baseline to 3 months in the EBV group compared to the SoC group. The mMRC (Modified Medical Research Council) stratifies severity of dyspnea in respiratory diseases. The severity of dyspnea is rated on a scale of 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more limitations.

Percent Change (%) in the mMRC Dyspnea Score From Baseline to 3 MonthsAt baseline and after 3 months

Mean percent change in the mMRC Dyspnea Score from Baseline to 3 months in the EBV group compared to the SoC group. The mMRC (Modified Medical Research Council) stratifies severity of dyspnea in respiratory diseases. The severity of dyspnea is rated on a scale of 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more limitations.

Absolute Change in the CAT Total Score From Baseline to 3 MonthsAt baseline and after 3 months

Mean absolute change in the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Total Score from Baseline to 3 months in the EBV group compared to the SoC group.

The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is an eight-item questionnaire designed to quantify the impact of COPD symptoms on the health status of patients. The CAT provides a score of 0-40 to indicate the impact of disease.

Percent Change (%) in CAT Total Score From Baseline to 3 MonthsAt baseline and after 3 months

The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is an eight-item questionnaire designed to quantify the impact of COPD symptoms on the health status of patients. The CAT provides a score of 0-40 to indicate the impact of disease. Higher scores denote a more severe impact of COPD on a patient's life.

Absolute Change in EQ-5D Summary Index From Baseline to 3 MonthsAt baseline and after 3 months

Mean absolute change in the EQ-5D Summary Index from Baseline to 3 months in the EBV group compared to the SoC group.

EQ-5D is a standardized instrument to measure health-related quality of life that can be used in a wide range of health conditions and treatments. The EQ-5D consists of a descriptive system and the EQ VAS.

The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D health states may be converted into a single summary index by applying a formula that attaches weights to each of the levels in each dimension. The maximum score of 1 indicates the best health state, while 0 indicates the worst health state.

Percent Change (%) in EQ-5D Summary Index From Baseline to 3 MonthsAt baseline and after 3 months

Mean percent change in EQ-5D Summary Index from Baseline to 3 months in the EBV group compared to the SoC group.

Absolute Change in EQ-5D VAS (Health State Today) Score From Baseline to 3 MonthsAt baseline and after 3 months

Mean absolute change in the EQ-5D VAS (Health State Today) Score from Baseline to 3 months in the EBV group compared to the SoC group. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcome.

Trial Locations

Locations (8)

Ludwig-Boltzmann-Institut für COPD und Pneumologische Epidemiologie

🇦🇹

Vienna, Austria

Department of pulmonary dieases, University Medical Center

🇳🇱

Groningen, Netherlands

Klinikum Nürnberg Nord

🇩🇪

Nürnberg, Germany

Thoraxklinik am Universitäts klinikum Heidelberg

🇩🇪

Heidelberg, Germany

Lungenklinik Hemer

🇩🇪

Hemer, Germany

Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum

🇩🇪

Berlin, Germany

Lungenabteilung Thoraxzentrum Hamburg

🇩🇪

Hamburg, Germany

Ruhrlandklinik, Westdeutsches Lungenzentrum

🇩🇪

Essen, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath