MedPath

A Prospective Multicentre Study Evaluating the Outcomes of the Abdominal Wall Dehiscence Repair Using Posterior Component Separation With Transversus Abdominis Muscle Release Reinforced by a Retro-muscular Mesh - Filling a Step

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Abdominal Wall Defect
Interventions
Procedure: outcomes of complete burst abdomen repair using posterior component separation technique with transversus abdominis muscle release reinforced by sublay mesh
Registration Number
NCT05278117
Lead Sponsor
Zagazig University
Brief Summary

Purpose: This study determined the incidence of burst abdomen recurrent (BAR), incisional hernia(IH), and surgical site occurrence (SSO) following burst abdomen surgical treatment after abdominal midline incisions using a posterior component separation(CS) technique with transversus abdominis muscle release (TAR) reinforced by retro-muscular mesh technique.

Methods: Between June 2014 and April 2018, 202 patients with grade IA BA (Björck's first classification) were treated in a prospective multiple-center cohort study.

Detailed Description

This study determined the incidence of burst abdomen recurrent (BAR), incisional hernia(IH), and surgical site occurrence (SSO) following burst abdomen surgical treatment after abdominal midline incisions using a posterior component separation(CS) technique with transversus abdominis muscle release (TAR) reinforced by retro-muscular mesh technique.

Methods: Between June 2014 and April 2018, 202 patients with grade IA BA (Björck's first classification) were treated in a prospective multiple-center cohort study.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
202
Inclusion Criteria
  • BA Grade IA according to Björck's initial classification following midline laparotomy from various departments,
  • ≥ 18 years
  • both sex
  • emergency or elective surgery
Exclusion Criteria
  • BA grade 1B,2,3, and 4 according to Björck's initial classification,
  • < 18 years,
  • primary laparotomy performed through a non-midline incision, open abdomen,
  • if another laparotomy had been performed between the surgery for BA and the end of the follow-up period,
  • concomitant intra-abdominal surgery, abdominal complications during BA surgery,
  • adherent bowel to the defect edge that cannot be separated,
  • patients lost during follow up,
  • presence of intra-abdominal contamination that cannot be controlled radiologically,
  • history of previous BA repair,
  • stoma exteriorized from the midline primary wound,
  • temporarily wound closure techniques,
  • prior abdominal surgeries other than operation resulted in BA,
  • prior abdominal wall hernia repair with or without mesh,
  • history of collagen diseases

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
complete burst abdomen repairoutcomes of complete burst abdomen repair using posterior component separation technique with transversus abdominis muscle release reinforced by sublay meshcomplete burst abdomen repair
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
incisional hernia3.5 years

incidence of incisional hernia measured by clinical examination and computerized tomography by %

recurrent burst abdomen3.5 years

incidence of recurrent burst abdomen by %

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
incidence of surgical site infection30 days

by %

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Tamer Alsaied Alnaimy

🇪🇬

Zagazig, Sharkia, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath