Intestinal Akkermansia Muciniphila in Prostate Cancer
- Conditions
- Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
- Interventions
- Diagnostic Test: Biological samples
- Registration Number
- NCT06242509
- Lead Sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Brief Summary
Prostate cancer has the highest incidence and is the second leading cause of cancer death in men in western countries. Androgen deprivation therapy is the backbone treatment. However, after a latency hormone sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) usually progresses to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) requiring treatments including next generation hormonal therapies with Abiraterone Acetate (AA). This, with limited survival.
A particularly challenging area of interest to improve outcome in cancer is the interaction between the microbiome and anti-cancer therapies. Emerging data demontrate in pre-clincal studies that prostate cancer alters the microbiota, with loss of diversity and depletion of beneficial bacteria including A. muciniphila. In the other hand, Androgen deprivation therapy, reverses these effects. Specifically, in advanced disease with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), it has been shown in small studies that Abiraterone Acetate, can modulate patient-associated gastro-intestinal microbiota through promoting the growth of A. muciniphila.
The goal of our study is to confirm that AA could promote fecal Akkermansia muciniphila growth and to use the enrichment of fecal Akkermansia muciniphila as a minimally invasive biomarker of response to AA in first line metastatic CRPC.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- Male
- Target Recruitment
- 52
- Be willing and not opposed to the study
- Be ≥ 18 years of age at the time of inclusion.
- Histologically or cytologically documented adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
- Have metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with castrate-level testosterone (<50 ng/dL) during the study
- Initiation of abiraterone acetate therapy or any other next-generation hormonal therapies within 15 days after inclusion
- Participants must be able and willing to comply with the study visit schedule and study procedures
- Affiliated with French social security
- CRPC patients who were previously treated with any next generation hormonal therapies in a metastatic CRPC setting
- Person under legal protection
- Inability to obtain the non-opposition
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) receiving next generation hormonal therapy Biological samples -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Relative abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila At 1 month Between baseline and Month 1 of next-generation hormonotherapy (NGHT), compared between responders versus non-responders.
The response is defined as an early PSA decrease \> 50% at one month of NGHT.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Beta diversity At 3 months Assessed by Bray-Curtis dissimilarity (Microbial Diversity)
Anti- Akkermansia muciniphila IgG levels At 3 months Alpha diversity At 3 months Assessed by Shannon index (Microbial Richness)
PSA progression-free (PSA-PFS) survival At 3 months According to fecal Akkermansia muciniphila baseline relative abundance. PSA-PFS will be defined as the time from treatment initiation to PSA progression as per PCWG3 (The Prostate Cancer Working Group 3) or death, whichever occurs first; patients without event at M3 will be treated as censored observations.
Relative variation in PSA At 1 month Relative variation in PSA between baseline PSA and nadir value, according to fecal Akkermansia muciniphila enrichment
Receiver Operating curve (ROC) At 3 months Receiver Operating curve (ROC) of the baseline relative abundance of fecal Akkermansia muciniphila to predict PSA response
Anti- Akkermansia muciniphila IgA levels At 3 months Relative variation of the relative abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila At 3 months Between baseline and Month 3 of AA treatment, compared between responders versus non responders