EnDovascular Therapy Plus Best Medical Treatment (BMT) Versus BMT Alone for MedIum VeSsel Occlusion sTroke - a prAgmatic, International, Multicentre, Randomized triaL (DISTAL)
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Acute Ischemic Stroke
- Sponsor
- University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
- Enrollment
- 543
- Locations
- 56
- Primary Endpoint
- Degree of dependency and disability in everyday life (measured with the mRS)
- Status
- Active, not recruiting
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is one of the main causes of disability and loss of quality adjusted life years. This study is to analyze whether endovascular therapy (EVT) in addition to best medical treatment (BMT) reduces the degree of disability and dependency in daily activities after a Medium Vessel Occlusion (MeVO) stroke compared to BMT alone.
Detailed Description
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is one of the main causes of death and disability and thereby the third leading cause of loss of quality adjusted life years. For patients with an AIS due to an occlusion of the large vessels of the anterior circulation, endovascular therapy (EVT) has become a treatment standard. 20-40% of all AIS patients have occlusions of smaller vessels and present with a more distal isolated Medium Vessel Occlusion (MeVO). The primary objective of this randomized trial is to determine whether patients experiencing an AIS due to an isolated medium vessel occlusion have superior functional outcome (measured with the Modified Rankin Scale "mRS" at 90 days) when treated with EVT plus best medical treatment (BMT) compared to patients treated with BMT alone. In this trial, all commercially available, CE-certified revascularisation devices (i.e. stent-retriever, aspiration catheters and balloon guide catheters) can be used for EVT. All established techniques for the endovascular treatment of AIS patients are permitted and all decisions regarding treatment technique and choice of devices and/or medications are made solely by the treating physician.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Acute ischemic stroke
- •Treatment (arterial puncture) can be initiated 2.
- •Within 6 hours of last seen well (LSW) OR 2.
- •Within 6 to 24 hours of LSW AND
- •CT Criteria: Evidence of a hypoperfusion-hypodensity mismatch (Absence of hypodensity on the noncontrast CT within ≥ 90% of the area of the hypoperfused lesion on perfusion CT)
- •MRI Criteria: Evidence of a diffusion-hyperintensity mismatch (Absence of hyperintensity on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging within ≥ 90% of the area of the diffusion weighted imaging(DWI) lesion)
- •Isolated medium vessel occlusion (i.e. an occlusion of the co-/non-dominant M2, the M3/M4 segment of theMCA, the A1/A2/A3 segment of the ACA or the P1/P2/P3 segment of the PCA) confirmed by CT or MRIAngiography
- •National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) Score of ≥ 4 points or symptoms deemed clearly disabling by treating physician (i.e. aphasia, hemianopia, etc.)
- •Informed Consent as documented by signature or fulfilling the criteria for emergency consent/ deferral consent
- •Agreement of treating physician to perform endovascular procedure
Exclusion Criteria
- •Acute intracranial haemorrhage
- •Patient bedridden or presenting from a nursing home
- •In-Hospital Stroke
- •Known (serious) sensitivity to radiographic contrast agents, nickel, titanium metals or their alloys
- •Foreseeable difficulties in follow-up due to geographic reasons (e.g. patients living abroad)
- •Pregnancy or lactating women. A negative pregnancy test before randomisation is required for all women with child-bearing potential.
- •Known history of arterial tortuosity, pre-existing stent, other arterial disease and/or known disease at the arterial access site that would prevent the device from reaching the target vessel and/or preclude safe recovery after EVT
- •Severe comorbidities, which will likely prevent improvement or follow-up
- •Radiological confirmed evidence of mass effect or intracranial tumour (except small meningioma)
- •Radiological confirmed evidence of cerebral vasculitis
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Degree of dependency and disability in everyday life (measured with the mRS)
Time Frame: at 90 days (± 14 days) after randomisation
The primary outcome is the degree of dependency and disability in everyday life (measured with the mRS) at 90 days. The mRS is the standard tool to assess neurological outcome in trials with acute severe brain disease. The scale runs from 0-6, running from perfect health without symptoms (= 0) to death (= 6).
Secondary Outcomes
- Assessment of Cognitive function using the validated Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA)(at 90 days (± 14 days) after randomisation)
- Radiologic occurrence of intracranial haemorrhages(within 24 hours (± 6 hours) post randomisation)
- Change in percentage of penumbral tissue saved (Imaging Data Evaluation)(at baseline and post-interventional at 24 hours (± 6 hours) post-randomisation)
- Change in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)(24 hours post-randomization (+/- 6 hours))
- Change in Quality of life as assessed by the EuroQol-5D(at 90 ± 14 days and at 1 year after randomisation)
- Patient residential status(at one year (± 30 days) after randomisation)
- Degree of dependency and disability in everyday life (measured with the mRS)(at one year (± 30 days) after randomisation)