Retrospective Study of Implants With Peri-implantitis Surgically Treated Using Enamel Matrix Derivative (EMD)
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Determination of Beneficial Effect of Using Enamel Matrix Derivative During Implant Treatment
- Sponsor
- North Dallas Dental Health
- Enrollment
- 34
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- retention of the implant
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 3 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The existing records of a private practice limited to the practice of periodontology were reviewed to locate patients who had been diagnosed with peri-implantitis (failing dental implant) and had been surgically treated utilizing enamel matrix derivative (Commercially available FDA product Emdogain sold by Straumann USA). Various clinical factors were gathered from the existing records. Some of the factors recorded were: retention of the implant, presence of bleeding, presence of further damage, and presence of inflammation. All patients had signed an informed consent for treatment and the anonymous use of their data for research purposes. All HIPA requirements were followed.
Detailed Description
See brief summary.
Investigators
Thomas G Wilson, Jr. DDS
Private Practitioner
North Dallas Dental Health
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •all adult patients of record who presented with existing peri-implantitis that was clinically deemed treatable (the implant was not considered hopeless.)
Exclusion Criteria
- •none except for routine medical contraindications for periodontal surgery
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
retention of the implant
Time Frame: 0.71 to 6.4 years
Determine if the implant was still present at the time of reevaluation
Secondary Outcomes
- record the clinical condition of the implant at the time of reevaluation(0.71 to 6.4 years)